 | | Guess who's next? —David Koudys
|
| | | Let's play a game! We all throw in 10 bucks and state, for the record, who the next coutry targeted for 'WoMD disarmament' and 'harbouring terr'sts'-- I guess Syria (URL) and British officials turned up the diplomatic heat Monday on Syria, with the (...) (21 years ago, 14-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Guess who's next? —Scott Costello
|
| | | | | (...) That's not hard guess, not even worth even money in Vegas. That's all the news stations can talk about these days with little exciting going on now. (...) I don't see it happening, would be convienent as we already have the troops and (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Guess who's next? —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | (...) Well no--he didn't kick out the inspectors--the inspectors were ordered out by the UN, just like this time--the inspectors were ordered out so the US could vent their aggressive tendancies. And again, if Iraq blatantly defied UN resolutions, (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Guess who's next? —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | (...) I hear the ministry of oil has been very well protected since the fall of Baghdad... but hospitals have been looted. Scott A (21 years ago, 15-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Guess who's next? —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) And museums, while we're at it. Dave! (21 years ago, 15-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: Guess who's next? —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | | | | | | (...) Yes, I like that-- "We had no idea that the museums would be looted!" sayeth the US forces... even after repeated requests and warnings from the curators... (URL) don't think anyone anticipated that the riches of Iraq would be looted by the (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: Guess who's next? —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) ...while troops were busy toppling statutes for the benefit of the world's media. Scott A (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Guess who's next? —Terry Prosper
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) Maybe they thought that's where the chemical weapons were hidden? ;-) Terry (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Guess who's next? —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) Is there not a scene in "The English Patient" [film version] with a booby-trapped statue? Scott A (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Guess who's next? —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Scott! Really! Implying like that! The US is above reproach here! Shame on you. Dave K (21 years ago, 15-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Guess who's next? —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) 17. Wow! This is what Isreal has defied between 48 & 92: Res 101, 106, 111, 127, 162, 171, 228, 237, 248, 250, 251, 256, 259, 262, 265, 267, 270, 271, 279, 280, 285, 298, 313, 316, 317, 332, 337, 347, 425, 427, 444, 446, 450, 452, 465, 467, (...) (21 years ago, 15-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Guess who's next? —Fredrik Glöckner
|
| | | | | (...) I'm guessing that the US are simply using their miltary presence in the ME for what it's worth: To put pressure on other countries, whose policy they would like to see changed. BTW, I heard on BBC World Service recently that Rumsfeld was asked (...) (21 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Guess who's next? —Stefan Garcia
|
| | | | My money's on Syria or Iran. I say while we have the troops over there, use 'em. It'll cost less than redeploying them. :^) -Stefan- (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
