Subject:
|
WOMD [weapons of mass *deception*]
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 10 Feb 2003 10:39:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
239 times
|
| |
|
|
> > And the allies didn't kill many German citizens in the second WW. Well, not
> > as much as they will kill Iraqi citizen in the upcoming war, since US troops
> > will only go were the bombs have destroyed and kill everything first...
> > Like in 1992.
>
> German civilian loses were somewhere around 2,000,000. Civilian loses
> caused by the US in 1992 and Afghanistan were astonishingly light in
> comparison. Actually invading Iraq will cause more civilian damage than in
> the Desert Storm operation, though.
Given that civilians were targeted in WW2, I don't see how the two can be
compared? In Afghanistan, we had the ability to prosecute the intervention with
far less civilian casualties [that fact that far less than 2,000,000 died is
not a laudable point]. However, as the "wimps" in the focus groups in the US
lack the stomach for a fighting war, civilians had to pay the price. I expect
the same will happen in the looming war in Iraq. We’ll see more high altitude
bombing, more cluster bombs and we’ll be subjected to the usual WOMD [weapons
of mass *deception*].
Scott A
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
7 Messages in This Thread:
   
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
