To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 18925
18924  |  18926
Subject: 
astonishingly light? [Re: Its about time someone put this concept in print.]
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 11 Feb 2003 12:15:50 GMT
Viewed: 
356 times
  
German civilian loses were somewhere around 2,000,000.  Civilian loses
caused by the US in 1992 and Afghanistan were astonishingly light in
comparison.  Actually invading Iraq will cause more civilian damage than in
the Desert Storm operation, though.

I can't see the wood for the trees! I found this page:

Afghanistan War Produces High Civilians-Killed-Per-Bomb-Dropped Ratio
http://www.cursor.org/stories/civpertons.htm

key passage:
==+==
After surveying numerous reports on civilian impact deaths caused by bombing, I
estimate the following numbers : Cambodia @ 100,000; Iraq @ 3,000; Serbia @
1,200; and Afghanistan @ 3,700. These translate into respective kill ratios
[civilians killed per 10,000 tons of bombs] of : Afghanistan @ 2,643; Cambodia
@ 1,852; Serbia @ 522; and Iraq @ 341.
==+==

So the civilian kill rate is 2643 innocents per 10000 tons of bombs.

300k-600k German civilians were killed in WW2 due to bombing. After some
searching, I found an estimate that the UK & USA [i.e. not the allies] dropped
1350000 tons of bombs on Germany [’37 borders]. That gives a kill rate of

~0.3x10^6 / [1.35x10^6/10000] = ~2222 per 10000 tons of bombs.
or
~0.6x10^6 / [1.35x10^6/10000] = ~4444 per 10000 tons of bombs.

So the civilian kill rate is ~2222-4444 innocents per 10000 tons of bombs.

I'm open to correction if anyone can find better data. I expect death rates in
both Germany & Afghanistan to be a good deal higher.

Scott A


Two axe grinders:  ;)

Bombs on Germany:
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v02/v02p381_Wesserle.html

Bomb Deaths:
http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/SOD.CHAP13.HTM



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Its about time someone put this concept in print.
 
(...) Just for the record, it's more like 22 million. And the central government has a fair amount of cash from oil income. (...) We aided him once he was already there, and it was more a case of we were trying to annoy Iran rather than aid Saddam (...) (22 years ago, 7-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

7 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR