To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 18925
18924  |  18926
Subject: 
astonishingly light? [Re: Its about time someone put this concept in print.]
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 11 Feb 2003 12:15:50 GMT
Viewed: 
1520 times
  
> German civilian loses were somewhere around 2,000,000.  Civilian loses
> caused by the US in 1992 and Afghanistan were astonishingly light in
> comparison.  Actually invading Iraq will cause more civilian damage than in
> the Desert Storm operation, though.

I can't see the wood for the trees! I found this page:

Afghanistan War Produces High Civilians-Killed-Per-Bomb-Dropped Ratio
http://www.cursor.org/stories/civpertons.htm

key passage:
==+==
After surveying numerous reports on civilian impact deaths caused by bombing, I
estimate the following numbers : Cambodia @ 100,000; Iraq @ 3,000; Serbia @
1,200; and Afghanistan @ 3,700. These translate into respective kill ratios
[civilians killed per 10,000 tons of bombs] of : Afghanistan @ 2,643; Cambodia
@ 1,852; Serbia @ 522; and Iraq @ 341.
==+==

So the civilian kill rate is 2643 innocents per 10000 tons of bombs.

300k-600k German civilians were killed in WW2 due to bombing. After some
searching, I found an estimate that the UK & USA [i.e. not the allies] dropped
1350000 tons of bombs on Germany [’37 borders]. That gives a kill rate of

~0.3x10^6 / [1.35x10^6/10000] = ~2222 per 10000 tons of bombs.
or
~0.6x10^6 / [1.35x10^6/10000] = ~4444 per 10000 tons of bombs.

So the civilian kill rate is ~2222-4444 innocents per 10000 tons of bombs.

I'm open to correction if anyone can find better data. I expect death rates in
both Germany & Afghanistan to be a good deal higher.

Scott A


Two axe grinders:  ;)

Bombs on Germany:
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v02/v02p381_Wesserle.html

Bomb Deaths:
http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/SOD.CHAP13.HTM



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Its about time someone put this concept in print.
 
(...) Just for the record, it's more like 22 million. And the central government has a fair amount of cash from oil income. (...) We aided him once he was already there, and it was more a case of we were trying to annoy Iran rather than aid Saddam (...) (24 years ago, 7-Feb-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

7 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR