To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 18759
18758  |  18760
Subject: 
Re: illegal Taxpayer funded campaigning ?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:27:07 GMT
Viewed: 
407 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Simon Bennett writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In for a penny, in for a pound (1), >
1 - a pound of what? The saying doesn't specify. I choose not to say either.
++Lar

Oh come on Larry, it's quite clearly meant to refer to Sterling currency.
In for a "1p" in for a "£".

Right you are... sorry for missing that!



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: illegal Taxpayer funded campaigning ?
 
(...) Oh come on Larry, it's quite clearly meant to refer to Sterling currency. In for a "1p" in for a "£". Mind you I wonder what we'll say if we ever take the plunge? "In for a cent, in for a Euro" sounds rubbish. (22 years ago, 21-Jan-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

5 Messages in This Thread:


Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR