Subject:
|
Re: illegal Taxpayer funded campaigning ?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 22 Jan 2003 01:27:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
384 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Simon Bennett writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > In for a penny, in for a pound (1), >
> > 1 - a pound of what? The saying doesn't specify. I choose not to say either.
> > ++Lar
>
> Oh come on Larry, it's quite clearly meant to refer to Sterling currency.
> In for a "1p" in for a "£".
Right you are... sorry for missing that!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
5 Messages in This Thread: ![illegal Taxpayer funded campaigning ? -Larry Pieniazek (21-Jan-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: illegal Taxpayer funded campaigning ? -David Koudys (21-Jan-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: illegal Taxpayer funded campaigning ? -Scott Arthur (22-Jan-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: illegal Taxpayer funded campaigning ? -Simon Bennett (21-Jan-03 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|