Subject:
|
Re: illegal Taxpayer funded campaigning ?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 21 Jan 2003 23:22:42 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
379 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In for a penny, in for a pound (1), >
> 1 - a pound of what? The saying doesn't specify. I choose not to say either.
> ++Lar
Oh come on Larry, it's quite clearly meant to refer to Sterling currency.
In for a "1p" in for a "£".
Mind you I wonder what we'll say if we ever take the plunge? "In for a
cent, in for a Euro" sounds rubbish.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | illegal Taxpayer funded campaigning ?
|
| In for a penny, in for a pound (1), as they say... Herewith an article from Reason, one of my favorite magazines: (URL) the case that our Drug Czar has been using taxpayer funds to cock referendums without obeying the proper forms... I hope NV finds (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jan-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
