 | | Re: The US gives too much/not enough aid —Scott Arthur
|
| | | (...) I'm not ignoring anything. GDP is the standard way of measuring it - under Agenda 21, the Official Development Assistance (ODA) aid target of 0.7% of GDP was set. Even when measured per head of population, the USA is still hitting below its (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The US gives too much/not enough aid —David Koudys
|
| | | | In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes: <snip> (...) Bingo. (...) Ouch! Truth. (...) Slam! Down goes Fraser! (...) And finally the punch that Ali never threw--Wow, new appreciation for Scott. (...) Wow! Scott hit the nail directly on the (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | "Slam! Down goes Fraser!" [?] —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | (...) You'll have to explain this colloquialism to me. Scott A (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: "Slam! Down goes Fraser!" [?] —David Koudys
|
| | | | | | (...) Is much like if I say 'The Giants Win the Pennant!! The Giants win the pennant!!" but more apt--is the line the announcer said when the finishing blow in a famous boxing match was thrown--"Down goes Fraser!" = finishing blow = nail in coffin = (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The US gives too much/not enough aid —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) Don't forget Lend Lease (did we ever get any of the lends back?) (...) True but irrelevant. What matters is who would have won if we hadn't entered, and if you conclude the Allies would have (not a foregone conclusion by any means), at what (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The US gives too much/not enough aid —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) No, but we got Dr. Who, Monty Python, Absolutely Fabulous, and The Young Ones. (...) The US benefitted in terms of the synthetic rubber industry, computer industry, aircraft manufacturing industry, and the certainly in terms of the advent of (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The US gives too much/not enough aid —David Koudys
|
| | | | | (...) Not hard at all--science. More specifics--space program, aeronautics, other stuff--yes the world benefitted from these things but specifically, the US--letting in German scientists and turning a blind eye to some atrocities during the war they (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The US gives too much/not enough aid —Jason Maxwell
|
| | | | | | | (...) Well considering the decision to drill in Alaska hasn't been made yet, and has failed every time so far that Congress has tried to pass it, I think you're jumping the gun on this one. I'd say that the U.S. is at worst split down the middle (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The US gives too much/not enough aid —Christopher Tracey
|
| | | | | | | (...) Hi Dave, I agree with you that these affect the global environment, but you do they show exploitation of the developing world? -chris (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The US gives too much/not enough aid —John P. Henderson
|
| | | | | | (...) Not to get off-topic (well, this is the off-topic forum), but I am curious, what would the people making 10 cents a day make as income if U.S.ians didn't buy Nike shoes? Would they make nothing a day? Are there jobs in their countries that pay (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: The US gives too much/not enough aid —Christopher Tracey
|
| | | | | | (...) What about US corporations preventing their laborors in the third world from unionizing? I'm sure they have had a hand in local politics as well. Didn't anyone see Zoolander (half joking). (...) Pittsburgh has largely cleaned itself up. Most (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The US gives too much/not enough aid —Christopher Tracey
|
| | | | | (...) This statement should no have to be proved to such a keen observer of the world but since you asked. 1) I was reading about the island of Borneo the other day and the exploitation of the their rainforests to provide cheap lumber to Japan (a (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The US gives too much/not enough aid —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | (...) I'd argue the "true but irrelavant" charge. Ignore Europe, stomp Japan with all our resources (is anyone contesting we couldn't do it?) then deal with Germany. Japan only took so long because they were on the constant back-burner. It's a silly (...) (22 years ago, 12-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The US gives too much/not enough aid —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | | (...) I'm not "anti-American", I'm pro-justice. Understand the difference. Scott A (22 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The US gives too much/not enough aid —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) Have you been watching war movies again? ;) This is what Ambrose had to say about the D-Day campaign [a/the key WW2 campaign]: ==+== That a cross-Channel attack against the Atlantic Wall could even be contemplated was a tribute to what Dwight (...) (22 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The US gives too much/not enough aid —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) Yes. (...) I expect the cost would have been high, but worth paying. (...) Others have already. But if it matters to you, feel free to disprove it. (...) I think it is every bit as relevant as WW1. The USA continues to make bad decisions – (...) (22 years ago, 13-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
