|
|
 | | Re: Vote against/for...
|
| (...) That is why our Founding Fathers created a government of checks and balances. Our executive branch has no such thing and absolute power. A nice aphorism, but not germane. But I will hold the example our world dominance today up against any (...) (23 years ago, 9-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Vote against/for...
|
| (...) Well, that's the problem now, isn't it? There *are* those in this world who can't just live and let live. If we don't subscribe to their particular POV, then we must be killed. There isn't much room for compromise there. And BTW, those who nit (...) (23 years ago, 9-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Vote against/for...
|
| (...) Perhaps you'd care to prove the correlation between "more money spent on education" and "better education"? It hasn't held up too well under close examination so far. BTW, welcome to .debate! (23 years ago, 9-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Vote against/for...
|
| (...) Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. Perhaps you should remember this and then start to worry about how much power your president has. (23 years ago, 9-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Vote against/for...
|
| (...) I can only suppose you don't know the answer to this or you would have never posed the question. The white. Oh, it's not as bad as it was during the sixties, but since the people in charge of hiring are still overwhelmingly white males, that's (...) (23 years ago, 9-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
