Subject:
|
Re: Vote against/for...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 9 Nov 2002 21:26:47 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
667 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Fiona Dickinson writes:
> > *You* could be in the majority too if you'd pull your head out and join the
> > Republican party to work for getting liberatarian agendas implemented, rather
> > than support the go-nowhere, impotent Losertarian party. You are not on a
> > mountaintop and your not with Thomas Jefferson. You are at the Jetson's home
> > and you are walking Astro: "Jane! Stop this crazy thing!
>
> Perhaps instead of spending so much money on fighting a war, the ruling
> party over there in the USA should spend some more money on education so
> that you could learn the difference between your and you're.
Perhaps you'd care to prove the correlation between "more money spent on
education" and "better education"? It hasn't held up too well under close
examination so far.
BTW, welcome to .debate!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Vote against/for...
|
| (...) It is anacdotal, but the EU countries spend more of thier GDP on education, and have higher adult literacy than the USA. At best, US school spending is average. Scott A (22 years ago, 10-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Vote against/for...
|
| (...) Perhaps instead of spending so much money on fighting a war, the ruling party over there in the USA should spend some more money on education so that you could learn the difference between your and you're. Maybe if there wasn't so much pig (...) (22 years ago, 9-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
161 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
