To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 18199
18198  |  18200
Subject: 
Re: Vote against/for...
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sun, 10 Nov 2002 12:27:48 GMT
Viewed: 
648 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Fiona Dickinson writes:
*You* could be in the majority too if you'd pull your head out and join the
Republican party to work for getting liberatarian agendas implemented, rather
than support the go-nowhere, impotent Losertarian party.  You are not on a
mountaintop and your not with Thomas Jefferson.  You are at the Jetson's home
and you are walking Astro: "Jane! Stop this crazy thing!

Perhaps instead of spending so much money on fighting a war, the ruling
party over there in the USA should spend some more money on education so
that you could learn the difference between your and you're.

Perhaps you'd care to prove the correlation between "more money spent on
education" and "better education"? It hasn't held up too well under close
examination so far.


It is anacdotal, but the EU countries spend more of thier GDP on education, and
have higher adult literacy than the USA. At best, US school spending is average.

Scott A



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Vote against/for...
 
(...) Perhaps you'd care to prove the correlation between "more money spent on education" and "better education"? It hasn't held up too well under close examination so far. BTW, welcome to .debate! (22 years ago, 9-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

161 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR