 | | Re: Evolution vs Scientific Creationism —Joseph Williams
|
| | | (...) Mabye this seems cold but I feel that this has to do with continuity of the species. Maternal instinct is found in many species to varying degree, as is monogamous relationships. Monogany helps assures fidelity, security and assures the (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Evolution vs Scientific Creationism —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) [snip] (...) Well, there are only three organisms that routinely recognize individual identity through graphic representations and the notion of self as tested with a mirror. Dolphins aren't one of them. We are. Obviously there is yet much to (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Evolution vs Scientific Creationism —Joseph Williams
|
| | | | When anthropologists encountered stone age tribes in Africa they exposed them to many objects of the industrial world including pictures. They didn't perceive them as a representative image, let alone the object they were depicting. To expose a (...) (22 years ago, 11-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Evolution vs Scientific Creationism —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | (...) I call "bullhockey." Citation, please. This just screams residual imperial mentality and the racist anthropology of the pre-WWI era--and the fact that you use it to make a point about nonhumans is extremely problematic. best LFB (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Evolution vs Scientific Creationism —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | (...) (probably should clarify--I'm not calling you racist, but calling the example one that's generated by racist hierarchy and totally useless in the context.) -LFB (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Evolution vs Scientific Creationism —Joseph Williams
|
| | | | | | (...) thanks for clarifying to me that I'm not a racist there, I was wondering about that for awhile now, nice for you to set me straight. As far as it being a useless point out of context, I was replying to a statement that dolphins could not see (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Evolution vs Scientific Creationism —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | | (...) Because "tribes in the stone age" is a severe value judgement. It implies that they exist along a continuum that has us at the "good" end and them at the "primitive" or less developed end. That's the core of development theory. And it's (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Evolution vs Scientific Creationism —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | (...) I'm OK with that so far as it goes... Tribes in the stone age ARE less developed. And I am perfectly OK characterising my life (and my society) as "better" than theirs. We have LEGO(r). They don't. QED. Next! ++Lar (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Evolution vs Scientific Creationism —Joseph Williams
|
| | | | | | (...) I had no idea that Stone Age was an unpc term. I must update my civilization terminolgy lexicon. Mabye metallurgically challenged? Not preferring alloys? Archae/anthro 'gists have been the worst ambassadors and tomb raiders since recorded (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Evolution vs Scientific Creationism —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | | (...) The big problem with it has little to do with the "emotional distress" it supposedly places on people (I said nothing about this, so I'm not sure where you got it from). It has to do with the fallacious logic that the creation of this linear (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Evolution vs Scientific Creationism —Joseph Williams
|
| | | | | | | (...) There are actual groups of people for lack of a better term, we'll call a tribe, who having no technology beyond stone tool making and limited agriculture fall into a social development known as the Stone Age. These cultures have been having (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Evolution vs Scientific Creationism —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | | | | (...) Where did you read that this was an indictment of your intentions regarding cultures? I was making a general point about the problems with the terminology *that is used in the field*, and you're accusing me of something totally out of left (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Evolution vs Scientific Creationism —Joseph Williams
|
| | | | | | (...) There are actual groups of people for lack of a better term, we'll call a tribe, who having no technology beyond stone tool making and limited agriculture fall into a social development known as the Stone Age. These cultures have been having (...) (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Evolution vs Scientific Creationism —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) Careful, your (non classical) liberal education is causing you to use loaded words... that they happen not to be correct is an added bonus for those keeping score at home. (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Evolution vs Scientific Creationism —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) I too wonder about this. I've heard that bandied about for years, but haven't seen any real accounts of it. I would like to read an account of this occurance. Chris (22 years ago, 12-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
