To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 16938
16937  |  16939
Subject: 
Re: Are some of you guys making it too easy on the rest of us?
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Fri, 5 Jul 2002 22:31:32 GMT
Viewed: 
467 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:

First off, choosing the senate as a basis for investigation is
flawed from the start because their terms are so long.

I'm not defending my post as a refutation of your claim, but I'm curious about
this.  How is long term limit a flaw?

The very idea of a senate was to provide a stabler body of legislators-- hence
the longer 6 year term.  If you merely get re-elected, you have already logged
12 years.

Compare that to a rep, which would represent 6 terms.

I was thinking of it as an asset because
it supplies a venue in which long periods of public service are reasonably
possible.  I'm not interested enough to track careers from county clerk through
two terms of House representation and note all the times and stuff.

Second, he calls a senator who has merely won his third term (but not served 1
day of the third term) a "long-timer".

Actually, by the way that I did the math, I think they have to have served
about half a year of the third term (or more if their first term was
fractional).  But I do figure that most senators did politics before to _some_
extent, so it's not really their career in a vaccuum.

Even he admitted that his exercise was inconclusive.

Do you actually have support for the 5:1 claim?  I figured you were just
shooting from the hip and I wasn't really interested in bugging you about the
specific accuracy of your claim.  But if you do have data, I'd be interested.

Yes, shooting from the hip, and not the time or inclination to research it
(because it seems too time-consuming to do so as I stated it) and I'm not sure
it would prove anything significant even if it were true.

I'll retract and put it to rest:-)

-John

-John



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Are some of you guys making it too easy on the rest of us?
 
(...) I'm not defending my post as a refutation of your claim, but I'm curious about this. How is long term limit a flaw? I was thinking of it as an asset because it supplies a venue in which long periods of public service are reasonably possible. (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

8 Messages in This Thread:




Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR