Subject:
|
Re: Are some of you guys making it too easy on the rest of us?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 5 Jul 2002 22:08:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1361 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Stangl writes:
> More often than not, I find myself not replying to many points in a
> discussion, because I just KNOW that by the time I start doing any decent
> research, one of you will have completed their research and posted the
> results by then
I know what you mean. I didn't figure anyone would actually do the Senate
thingy, I was just fooling around at work. :-)
> (e.g., Chris' research on term lengths in the Senate - I
> KNEW John's 5:1 was preposterous, but why waste time disproving it? By the
> time I had read John's post, Chris had already refuted it).
I actually don't think that I refuted it...just provided some data. But I
agree that his 5:1 is likely too high. On the other hand, the idea he was
expressing may be correct. I think a Republican is more likely to jump right
into serious politics through the use of significant money rather than basing
it on a career of service. That alone tips it in the direction, if not to the
extent that John suggested.
> It makes the threads more interesting, but it is making my research skills
> wither ;-)
You could do the House. ;-)
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
