Subject:
|
Re: Are some of you guys making it too easy on the rest of us?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 5 Jul 2002 21:35:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
372 times
|
| |
|
|
I think he refuted your 5:1 quite well within the short time constraints he had.
He certainly did a good job as far as *I* was concerned in showing there was
nowhere near a 5:1 ratio.
I'm sure he could do the same for HoR, but if you think he did NOT refute it,
prove your 5:1 to us all.
Where did you get this 5:1 ratio? Preconceived notions indeed.
John wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Stangl writes:
> > More often than not, I find myself not replying to many points in a
> > discussion, because I just KNOW that by the time I start doing any decent
> > research, one of you will have completed their research and posted the
> > results by then (e.g., Chris' research on term lengths in the Senate - I
> > KNEW John's 5:1 was preposterous, but why waste time disproving it? By the
> > time I had read John's post, Chris had already refuted it).
>
> Refuted it? Hardly. First off, choosing the senate as a basis for
> investigation is flawed from the start because their terms are so long.
> Second, he calls a senator who has merely won his third term (but not served 1
> day of the third term) a "long-timer". Even he admitted that his exercise was
> inconclusive.
>
> Your preconceived notions have clouded your judgment.
>
> -John
--
| Tom Stangl, Sun ONE Internet Technical Support, Sun Microsystems
| iPlanet Support - http://www.sun.com/service/support/software/iplanet/index.html
| Please do not associate my personal views with my employer
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
8 Messages in This Thread:
   
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
