 | | Are some of you guys making it too easy on the rest of us? —Tom Stangl
|
| | | More often than not, I find myself not replying to many points in a discussion, because I just KNOW that by the time I start doing any decent research, one of you will have completed their research and posted the results by then (e.g., Chris' (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Are some of you guys making it too easy on the rest of us? —John Neal
|
| | | | | (...) Refuted it? Hardly. First off, choosing the senate as a basis for investigation is flawed from the start because their terms are so long. Second, he calls a senator who has merely won his third term (but not served 1 day of the third term) a (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Are some of you guys making it too easy on the rest of us? —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | | | | I think he refuted your 5:1 quite well within the short time constraints he had. He certainly did a good job as far as *I* was concerned in showing there was nowhere near a 5:1 ratio. I'm sure he could do the same for HoR, but if you think he did (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Are some of you guys making it too easy on the rest of us? —John Neal
|
| | | | | | | | (...) My assertion was among career politicians (all politicians), the ones over 20 years of service would be 5:1 Democrat. I just pulled that ratio out of the air. His sample really had nothing to do with my hypothesis. -John (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Are some of you guys making it too easy on the rest of us? —Tom Stangl
|
| | | | | | | And how is the below any different than completing a third term? In either case, the INTENT was to work a third term, whether it was completed or not. (...) -- | Tom Stangl, Sun ONE Internet Technical Support, Sun Microsystems | iPlanet Support - (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Are some of you guys making it too easy on the rest of us? —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | | | (...) I'm not defending my post as a refutation of your claim, but I'm curious about this. How is long term limit a flaw? I was thinking of it as an asset because it supplies a venue in which long periods of public service are reasonably possible. (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Are some of you guys making it too easy on the rest of us? —John Neal
|
| | | | | | (...) The very idea of a senate was to provide a stabler body of legislators-- hence the longer 6 year term. If you merely get re-elected, you have already logged 12 years. Compare that to a rep, which would represent 6 terms. I was thinking of it (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Are some of you guys making it too easy on the rest of us? —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) I know what you mean. I didn't figure anyone would actually do the Senate thingy, I was just fooling around at work. :-) (...) I actually don't think that I refuted it...just provided some data. But I agree that his 5:1 is likely too high. On (...) (22 years ago, 5-Jul-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
