Subject:
|
True meaning assertions? (was Re: My version -- The meaning of CHRISTmas
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sun, 13 Dec 1998 06:09:05 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpien@ctp.IWANTNOSPAM#spamcake#.com
|
Viewed:
|
442 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Berry wrote:
>
> Now that Larry has defined the "True meaning of Christmas," I thought I would.
Oh, just as a clarification here, please, I dispute that I did any such
thing. This whole brawl started because I, in passing, but I contend
very much in context for my append, mentioned that "I celebrate
Christmas because it's fun, not because of Christ."
That hardly qualifies as defining any true meanings. And I'd say that
none of my subsequent posts to this group, prior to Steve making this
assertion, claimed to be defining anything either.
--
Larry Pieniazek http://my.voyager.net/lar
For me: No voyager e-mail please. All snail-mail to Ada, please.
- Posting Binaries to RTL causes flamage... Don't do it, please.
- Stick to the facts when posting about others, please.
- This is a family newsgroup, thanks.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | My version -- The meaning of CHRISTmas
|
| Now that Larry has defined the "True meaning of Christmas," I thought I would. Christmas, like it or not folks, is a CHRISTIAN holiday. It exists because Christ is the savior and this is the day we celebrate his birth. We don't celebrate Christmas (...) (26 years ago, 12-Dec-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
