 | | Re: The Free Super Chiefs —Jeremy Scott
|
| | | Note: It is against my rules to post here but because of the recent activity, which was caused by me, I decided to break that rule to address this issue and not ignore it. However, I am not here to stay... (...) James, Thanks for the apology. My (...) (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: The Free Super Chiefs (I Called LSAH) —Jeremy Scott
|
| | | | | To make all of us happy: I called LSAH and the lady told me all was okay, this happens often. If I wanted to pay for them I could but I said i'd rather keep them for free or have them sent back at the cost of Lego. She said, "keep it then." (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The Free Super Chiefs (I Called LSAH) —Todd Thuma
|
| | | | | | | (...) GET IT IN WRITING!!!!!!! Todd (23 years ago, 22-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The Free Super Chiefs (I Called LSAH) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | | | (...) The same happened to me a year or so ago. The second package is basically unsolicited mail. When I called Lego, I was told that they did not expect me to waste my time taking it back to the post office just to clear up their error. Scott A =+= (...) (23 years ago, 22-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | The role of ethics (was: The Free Super Chiefs) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | This whole topic comes down, in my opinion, to meaningless without agreeing on the role of some kind of ethics. (...) :-) (...) My first thought was that you were probably lying. After all, what adult would say that? You claim to be fifteen and that (...) (23 years ago, 24-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The role of ethics (was: The Free Super Chiefs) — Suzanne D. Rich
|
| | | | (...) [snip] Please respect Jeremy's wish to end his part in this debate... -Suz (23 years ago, 24-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The role of ethics (was: The Free Super Chiefs) —Christopher L. Weeks
|
| | | | (...) Suzanne, I don't understand the implications of your note. As the administrator here your words have a special gravity that seems to color what might otherwise be a simple statement. Do you mean "(I'm the admind and) you are hereby notified (...) (23 years ago, 25-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: The role of ethics (was: The Free Super Chiefs) — Suzanne D. Rich
|
| | | | (...) It's just like it looks: The LUGNET Admin (Suzanne Rich) posted a polite request. (...) Topic ignored, if your post had not continued direct questioning of Jeremy, it wouldn't have gotten my attention and resulted in my post, no. But your (...) (23 years ago, 27-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Difference between Admin and Member requests(was: The role of ethics) —Jude Beaudin
|
| | | | (...) Suz, What would have been the consequence (if any) had he or others chosen to ignore your request? Basically, what is the difference between a request from Suzanne Rich, LUGNET Admin and Suz, LUGNET Member #2? Jude XFUT .admin.general (23 years ago, 27-Mar-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| | | | |
