| |
In lugnet.technic, Ahui Herrera writes:
> In lugnet.technic, Ross Crawford writes:
> > In lugnet.technic, Miguel Agullo writes:
> > > > I see your use of the name as possibly diluting that recognition,
> > >
> > > This is not just picky, this is completely out of line considering that if
> > > Lego acted the same way (and there are legal precendents from other
> > > companies), we would have no Lugnet and, of course, no LDRAW.
> >
> > Not exactly - neither Lugnet nor Ldraw actually have the word LEGO in them. • And
> > note that LEGO *have* acted exactly that way WRT legOS.
> >
> > ROSCO
>
> You are wrong here ROSCO,
No, I'm not (IMO).
> LDraw stands for 'LEGO Draw' and LUGNET stands for 'LEGO USers Group
> Network', so you see both actually do use the word LEGO.
No, they are names, one letter of which stands for LEGO. They do not contain
the word LEGO. Why else do you think LEGO leaves them alone, while asking the
developers to rename legOS?
ROSCO
FUT: .o-t.debate
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Technic MOTM needs a new name.
|
| (...) You are wrong here ROSCO, LDraw stands for 'LEGO Draw' and LUGNET stands for 'LEGO USers Group Network', so you see both actually do use the word LEGO. Just for the record I don't have a comment/stance of this MOTO 'brickering' that is going (...) (23 years ago, 4-Mar-02, to lugnet.technic)
|
41 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
