Subject:
|
Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 18 Jan 2002 17:07:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
296 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Alfred Speredelozzi writes:
> I think what I did was a GOOD thing. At least in the idea that
> some good "How do we help the community" discussion has taken
> place.
Alfred,
I don't know how resolved this is in your understanding at this point. To
those of us who are the insiders here, or at least to me, this is how it
seemed:
1) There was this long-running fairly disruptive fight thing going on about,
between, and surrounding Scott and Larry.
2) There was finally, _finally_, FINALLY, some resolution even if it was an
unpleasant and ugly resolution.
3) This guy that doesn't normally participate here just "barged" in and tried
to stir the embers into a flame.
So from our perspective, your timing really sucked and it seemed like you were
just trying to egg the fight on. I would normally assume that if you read
the immediately significant threads and noted how long the issue had been
burried, that you wouldn't post a note like you did because it wouldn't have
any value to the discussion.
But it's really no big deal at this point. It was just a little mistakey kind
of thing. And Richard probably could have worded his admonition more
invitingly.
Chris
|
|
Message has 2 Replies: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi
|
| (...) I object to you labeling yourself an 'insider' in a multinational internet discussion group. I don't know who you are, or what your relationaship is to Lugnet (except as a poster) to Scott or Larry or to any other group. There are many groups (...) (22 years ago, 18-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi
|
| (...) Well, my reasoning is this: I don't read every part of Lugnet every day. In fact, I rarely read (or am even interested in) lugnet.general or lugnet.admin or off-topic debate. I am interested in Lego. So, what I read is usually lugnet.starwars, (...) (22 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
11 Messages in This Thread: ![For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi -Richard Marchetti (17-Dec-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![for the eyes of Suz (Was Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi -Larry Pieniazek (18-Dec-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.general)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi -Alfred Speredelozzi (17-Jan-02 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi -Richard Marchetti (17-Jan-02 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi -Alfred Speredelozzi (17-Jan-02 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi -Richard Marchetti (18-Jan-02 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi -Alfred Speredelozzi (18-Jan-02 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi -Larry Pieniazek (18-Jan-02 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi -Alfred Speredelozzi (18-Jan-02 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi -Christopher L. Weeks (18-Jan-02 to lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|