Subject:
|
Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 17 Jan 2002 18:37:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
331 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Alfred Speredelozzi writes:
> Well, my reasoning is this: I don't read every part of Lugnet every day. In
> fact, I rarely read (or am even interested in) lugnet.general or lugnet.admin
> or off-topic debate. <SNIP>Anyway, I don't see any of the posts on Lugnet as >being off limits for further discussion. If people thought they are, then >they should be cancelled!
Right, nothing is off limits. At the same time, people are expected to post
INFORMED statements showing that they have read most of the thread and at
least understand the basic issue under discussion. You did neither, and in
general that is considered bad netiquette.
> In short, I will not be silenced by the like of you. I will not respect your
> command to not post about the issue again. I will say my mind, when and if I
> have an opinion.
You are after the wrong guy on this count, generally I seek greater freedom
of expression. I am hardly seeking to silence you -- well, except for this
one post. It was just that you had wittingly or unwittingly jumped in on a
very sore subject of the off-topic newsgroup -- something that plagues it
perhaps to this very day, although things do seem better. Said subject
being the Scott and Larry Show.
And it was hardly a command. I did ask "please," although you might not
have liked the rest of that statement.
> About my accused lack of social skills..
...I will stand behind my words. I think your follow up makes all of my
points for me...
If you don't care enough to be informed, please consider not reading and not
posting in this newsgroup -- especially on topics you are almost guaranteed
to know little about.
-- Hop-Frog
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi
|
| (...) Well, you are plain wrong. I did read all of the thread (thoa I can't say that I have read every thread where Scott and Larry have squared off). I almost always read entire threads, because reading one message most of the time does not give (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: For the Eyes of Alfred Speredelozzi
|
| (...) Well, my reasoning is this: I don't read every part of Lugnet every day. In fact, I rarely read (or am even interested in) lugnet.general or lugnet.admin or off-topic debate. I am interested in Lego. So, what I read is usually lugnet.starwars, (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
11 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
