 | | Re: Slur used in Libertarian fliers (was Re: Fatwah) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) I agree with that and would fault them for not doing so. But it's not nearly the big deal that some make of it. (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Slur used in Libertarian fliers (was Re: Fatwah) —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) Agreed. It would be more of a reasonable PR move than a necessary statement of party purity. Harry Browne, for that matter, isn't exactly a paragon of virtue, but that absolutely does *not* invalidate even a single tenet of the Libertarian (...) (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Slur used in Libertarian fliers (was Re: Fatwah) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | (...) You forgot to point out that you have (to your satisfaction, if not to mine) invalidated some of them through other means, Dave! GRIN. (23 years ago, 19-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Slur used in Libertarian fliers (was Re: Fatwah) —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) Them? Surely you mean “us”, or have you resigned your membership? If you have not, what have you done to correct the situation? (...) I think it is not a huge issue. But according to my values it is a big deal. Scott A (23 years ago, 20-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Slur used in Libertarian fliers (was Re: Fatwah) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | (...) "Them" in this context are the officers. *I* already repudiated it, so it's not "us", it's them. (...) Sent them (the officers) a note about it. (23 years ago, 23-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
