Subject:
|
Re: Chick disproves Islam!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sun, 30 Sep 2001 14:30:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
166 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Bill Farkas writes:
> > 2. Arguing in a circle: If you have already assumed in your premise what you
> > are going to state in your conclusion, then you have ended where you began
> > and proven nothing.
>
>
> Kinda like a guy who rejects "traditional" views of morality, invents his
> own (!) and then declares himself righteous?!! Honestly, how bizarre is
> that?! Ruminate on that one for a while and then criticize all you want.
Heynowwaitaminnit! I resemble that remark.
Actually, that describes me well enough. But your implication is that the
logic therein is circular. Maybe I'm a little slow, but I don't see it. Could
you spell it out slowly for me?
thanks,
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Chick disproves Islam!
|
| (...) Kinda like a guy who rejects "traditional" views of morality, invents his own (!) and then declares himself righteous?!! Honestly, how bizarre is that?! Ruminate on that one for a while and then criticize all you want. I don't believe in God (...) (23 years ago, 30-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
