Subject:
|
Re: Chick disproves Islam!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sun, 30 Sep 2001 03:25:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
140 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Eaton writes:
> > This was far too funny not to post.
> >
> > http://www.chick.com/information/religions/islam/fallacies.asp
>
> Thanks for sharing! I especially cherished the ones that can just as easily
> be used against christianity like #2
>
> 2. Arguing in a circle: If you have already assumed in your premise what you
> are going to state in your conclusion, then you have ended where you began
> and proven nothing.
Yeah, for the majority of the article I felt like running a few perl regexps
on it:
s/islam/christianity/gi;
s/muhammed/jesus/gi;
s/koran/bible/gi;
Though my favorite by far was number 1: The Bible is older, so it's right!
Never mind the fact that by that logic one would be Jewish :) Or, heck, all
mother-earth worshippers :)
DaveE
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Chick disproves Islam!
|
| (...) be used against christianity like #2 2. Arguing in a circle: If you have already assumed in your premise what you are going to state in your conclusion, then you have ended where you began and proven nothing. (23 years ago, 29-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
13 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
