Subject:
|
Re: What we can do... (my 2 cents)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 29 Sep 2001 01:52:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
549 times
|
| |
![Post a public reply to this message](/news/icon-reply.gif) | |
Ack, I can't believe I didn't set groups right. I didn't want this
hiding in .pt alone. :D
In lugnet.loc.pt, Lindsay Frederick Braun writes:
> In lugnet.loc.pt, Bruce Schlickbernd writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Pedro Silva writes:
> >
> > > Examples of Arab influence are all but scarce around here. And I'd even risk
> > > saying that the New World was colonized by europeans thanks to an arab
> > > invention: the lateen sail, said so because of the use the Southern European
> > > nations made of it. And it is arguable that England or France would send
> > > expeditions due West if Spain and Portugal hadn't done it first...
>
> It's arguable that Portugal had very little interest in going
> West at any time (before Napoleon came around, of course :D ).
> Until very nearly the end of the 17th century, the Americas
> were more "obstacle" than anything else (Spain's dumb-luck find
> in Mesoamerica notwithstanding). The Portuguese had the idea of
> going around Africa to get to the real goal--South and East Asia--
> and, in fact, da Gama proved them right. IIRC the whole Brazil
> enterprise was almost an afterthought by comparison, and it never
> really turned a profit but rather ate Portuguese lives and fortunes
> whole. Only after independence did Brazil really become a fiscally
> lucrative venture. (D'oh!)
>
> Spain, on the other hand, was fairly poor. It almost broke 'em
> just to send the three wee cutters with Cristoforo Colombo.
>
> > Well noted on the arab influences, but the lateen sail was supplanted by the
> > square-rigged sail for transatlantic voyages fairly quickly, though it
> > remained popular in the Mediterranean for many centuries. Columbus' caravel
> > Nina was converted to a square rig, for example, though much early Spanish
> > and Portugese exploration was with lateen-rigged caravels. There is some
> > evidence that the Romans may have used lateen sails, though what I have seen
> > is far from conclusive.
>
> But the square-rig used for transatlantic sailing was a redesign
> of the old square-rig to give it the lateen's properties for tacking
> purposes. The sternpost rudder, the "ship hull", all came later and
> owe their innovation to borrowing.
>
> But even so, European ships were pretty weakly made and poorly
> manned until the 18th century. If you want to see the truly scary
> monstrous things the Chinese were putting on the water as early as
> the *fourteenth* century, take a look at this:
>
> http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/sultan/explorers.html
>
> They didn't borrow much from outside China because, well, they
> just plain didn't need to. The real triumph of European ship-
> building was the European propensity to sponge *everything* up
> from around the world and apply it in new and innovative ways.
> They *had* to, given their fear of the alternative.
>
> > Let's not forget 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, etc.
> > :-)
>
> We call those Arabic numerals, but they're actually a Hindi
> mathematical creation that the West borrowed via the Muslim
> world. The concept "zero" is completely Indian in origin.
>
> best
>
> LFB
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: ![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: What we can do... (my 2 cents)
|
| (...) Thnx. (...) *We* did not run west... the *queen* did - that marked the beggining of tourism in Brazil. The rest of the population had to stay and withstand the fight, with some help from the Brits (ah, Wellington... fascinating character) we (...) (23 years ago, 29-Sep-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.loc.pt)
|
Message is in Reply To:
![](/news/x.gif) | | Re: What we can do... (my 2 cents)
|
| (...) It's arguable that Portugal had very little interest in going West at any time (before Napoleon came around, of course :D ). Until very nearly the end of the 17th century, the Americas were more "obstacle" than anything else (Spain's dumb-luck (...) (23 years ago, 29-Sep-01, to lugnet.loc.pt)
|
10 Messages in This Thread: ![Re: What we can do... (my 2 cents) -Bruce Schlickbernd (27-Sep-01 to lugnet.loc.pt)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: What we can do... (my 2 cents) -Pedro Silva (27-Sep-01 to lugnet.loc.pt, lugnet.off-topic.debate)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: What we can do... (my 2 cents) -Bruce Schlickbernd (28-Sep-01 to lugnet.loc.pt, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.pirates)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: What we can do... (my 2 cents) -Dave Schuler (28-Sep-01 to lugnet.loc.pt, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.pirates)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/246.gif) ![Re: What we can do... (my 2 cents) -Larry Pieniazek (28-Sep-01 to lugnet.off-topic.fun)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: What we can do... (my 2 cents) -Pedro Silva (28-Sep-01 to lugnet.off-topic.fun)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/28.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: What we can do... (my 2 cents) -Pedro Silva (28-Sep-01 to lugnet.loc.pt, lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.pirates)](/news/x.gif)
![](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/68.gif) ![Re: What we can do... (my 2 cents) -Lindsay Frederick Braun (29-Sep-01 to lugnet.loc.pt)](/news/x.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![You are here](/news/here.gif) ![](/news/46.gif) ![Re: What we can do... (my 2 cents) -Pedro Silva (29-Sep-01 to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.loc.pt)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|