 | | Re: Survey methodology relating to latest LP SPAM —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) Why is it a moot point? (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | |
| | | | | The Height of Mootness —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | (...) Something in the water where I work makes about 9 out of 10 people refer to something that is no longer relevant as a "mute point," but I'm usually silent on such matters. Dave! (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The Height of Mootness —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | (...) (0) (...) Correcting their error would, I suspect, be moot. Or at least futile. (1) In this case, though, the only reason I can think that this particular point would be moot is that Scott wanted to be mute about his not having any other (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: The Height of Mootness —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) I was trying to incite a mootiny. Dave! (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: The Height of Mootness —James Brown
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) Any particular small cow, or are you not picky about which one you incite? <GD&R> James (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: The Height of Mootness —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) Presumably one that is easily tipped over? (1) I can't believe the way you milked that punchline. (2) Make hay while the sun shines, eh? 1 - I never did understand the allure of cow tipping. Struck me as smelly, dangerous, cruel, and not (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: The Height of Mootness —James Brown
|
| | | | | | | | | | | (...) Well, when you leave something like that out, sooner or later someone's going to step in it. I tend to bull my way around here, so it's not surprising it was me. (...) Hmm. Sounds like a frat party. <duck> (Although I admit, my frat knowledge (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: The Height of Mootness —Ross Crawford
|
| | | | | | | | | | Hey, isnt it time you guys moooved this over to that udder pun group? (...) Did (...) (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.pun)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: The Height of Mootness —Kyle D. Jackson
|
| | | | | | | | (...) - Because there's an atmosphere. - Why's there an atmosphere? - Well, because we need oxygen. - Why do we need oxygen? - So we can breathe. - Why do we breathe? - Who the h### are you, Carl Sagan?! Six months ago you were sitting in your own (...) (23 years ago, 12-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: The Height of Mootness —Dave Schuler
|
| | | | | | (...) AAARGH! Yet another coworker has just hit the moot button. Dave! (21 years ago, 3-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Survey methodology relating to latest LP SPAM —Scott Arthur
|
| | | | (...) OK. I'm not being clear again. I meant the relevance of the arugment was moot - not its content. Scott A (23 years ago, 11-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| | | | |
