Subject:
|
Re: Survey methodology relating to latest LP SPAM
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 11 Jul 2001 08:05:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
678 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > > > When did the polling take place?
> > > > What group was polled – age/sex/ethnic background?
> > > > What order were the questioned asked in?
> > > > Was any supplemental information given?
> > > > How was the poll undertaken - telephone / face-to-face/via the web?
> > > > Were any other questions asked?
> > > > Who are the “polling experts at the University of Connecticut” – and was
> > > > their comment related to the poll?
> > >
> > > http://www.freedomforum.org/publications/first/sofa/2001/sofa2001.pdf
> > >
> > > (methodology section)
> >
> > Sorry, I did not see it when I read over the webpage the other day. None the
> > less, I think that telephone surveys are not as good as the real thing.
> > However, this is a moot point.
>
> Why is it a moot point?
OK. I'm not being clear again. I meant the relevance of the arugment was
moot - not its content.
Scott A
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
189 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
