Subject:
|
Re: What is spam? (was Re: Scary Survey results about the US First Amendment
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 11 Jul 2001 10:42:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1776 times
|
| |
|
|
> I think he was referring to your efforts to veer the debate
> in an attempt to make First Amendment = Child Pornography.
> Granted, there's room for a .debate there, but that's not the
> crux of the matter (nor, technically, is it a problem with
> the First Amendment--child porn is *illegal* in every state
> of the US, and just because people still do it doesn't mean
> that the First Amendment is to blame).
Why is it illegal? Is it because the majority find it offensive, or because
of the exploitation/harm to children? Perhaps both? If no exploitation/harm
to childrenwas involved in any way, should it be available in a free
society? Should the market be allowed to decide?
Scott A
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
189 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
