Subject:
|
Re: Survey methodology relating to latest LP SPAM
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 10 Jul 2001 20:37:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
689 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > > When did the polling take place?
> > > What group was polled – age/sex/ethnic background?
> > > What order were the questioned asked in?
> > > Was any supplemental information given?
> > > How was the poll undertaken - telephone / face-to-face/via the web?
> > > Were any other questions asked?
> > > Who are the “polling experts at the University of Connecticut” – and was
> > > their comment related to the poll?
> >
> > http://www.freedomforum.org/publications/first/sofa/2001/sofa2001.pdf
> >
> > (methodology section)
>
> Sorry, I did not see it when I read over the webpage the other day. None the
> less, I think that telephone surveys are not as good as the real thing.
> However, this is a moot point.
Why is it a moot point?
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | The Height of Mootness
|
| (...) Something in the water where I work makes about 9 out of 10 people refer to something that is no longer relevant as a "mute point," but I'm usually silent on such matters. Dave! (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
189 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
