| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> Why is it a moot point?
Something in the water where I work makes about 9 out of 10 people refer
to something that is no longer relevant as a "mute point," but I'm usually
silent on such matters.
Dave!
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: The Height of Mootness
|
| (...) (0) (...) Correcting their error would, I suspect, be moot. Or at least futile. (1) In this case, though, the only reason I can think that this particular point would be moot is that Scott wanted to be mute about his not having any other (...) (23 years ago, 10-Jul-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
189 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
