Subject:
|
Re: Why the founding fathers limited government scope (was Re: Rolling Blackouts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Tue, 15 May 2001 07:46:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
786 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Daniel Jassim writes:
> > > > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > >
> > > > I am not going to reopen that particular thread except to say that I am
> > > > satisfied, based on my life long intake of news, opinion, propaganda and
> > > > falsehood, rather than based on any particular site, that my original
> > > > statement about which black was blacker is correct.
> > >
> > > A "correct" opinion based on lies, falsehoods, generalization, and sheepish
> > > acceptance of the Zionist media model.
> >
> > How wrong you are:
>
> So it's OK for you to quote out of context, then?
No, and that is not what I did.
>
> > "Israel has gotten, and continues to get, a raw deal in the world media, I
> > have no idea why."
> >
> > http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=6700
>
> I stand behind that. But if I were going to quote one para out of that post
> out of context, I would have chosen this one...
>
> > Are you comparing Barak, a democratically elected leader of a democratic state
> > that tolerates dissent and has a free press and the rule of law, and
> > mechanisms to carry out investigations of wrongdoing and a justice system that
> > administers justice fairly, and all that it implies... are you comparing Barak
> > with Sadam Hussein or Milosevich, or with any other random dictator?
>
> Since you never effectively answered it.
I think I did. I _still_ think you are wrong. I do not feel that Israel
"administers justice fairly" or respects the "rule of law". Eric Olsen
agreed with me on this:
http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=6776
You chose to muddy the waters with your rather dull 'I blame the UK for
Israel murderous ways' viewpoint:
http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=6777
Indeed the Mitchell report will condem Israel's use of "excessive" force.
Perhaps your rights based libertarian view suggests Israel "administers
justice fairly" or respects the "rule of law"... my personal viewpoint does not.
> (although you did post, what, 4
> responses to it?...
Inc a double post.
> Why so many? Couldn't compose your thoughts coherently
> the first three times???)
My views are not set in stone. I reserve the right to add to them. I note
that each of my replies directed questions straight at you. You failed to
answer them. Funny that.
>
> But that debate ought to be left to lie rather than reopened yet again. Tell
> you what, Scott, you can even have the last word on it in this subtree. Try
> to make it coherent. If you can.
I shall try.
The last word is... "coherent".
Scott A
>
> ++Lar
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
246 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
