To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 10492
10491  |  10493
Subject: 
Re: Why the founding fathers limited government scope (was Re: Rolling Blackouts
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 14 May 2001 18:28:05 GMT
Viewed: 
789 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Daniel Jassim writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:

I am not going to reopen that particular thread except to say that I am
satisfied, based on my life long intake of news, opinion, propaganda and
falsehood, rather than based on any particular site, that my original
statement about which black was blacker is correct.

A "correct" opinion based on lies, falsehoods, generalization, and sheepish
acceptance of the Zionist media model.

How wrong you are:

So it's OK for you to quote out of context, then?

"Israel has gotten, and continues to get, a raw deal in the world media, I
have no idea why."

http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=6700

I stand behind that. But if I were going to quote one para out of that post
out of context, I would have chosen this one...

Are you comparing Barak, a democratically elected leader of a democratic state
that tolerates dissent and has a free press and the rule of law, and
mechanisms to carry out investigations of wrongdoing and a justice system that
administers justice fairly, and all that it implies... are you comparing Barak
with Sadam Hussein or Milosevich, or with any other random dictator?

Since you never effectively answered it. (although you did post, what, 4
responses to it?... Why so many? Couldn't compose your thoughts coherently
the first three times???)

But that debate ought to be left to lie rather than reopened yet again. Tell
you what, Scott, you can even have the last word on it in this subtree. Try
to make it coherent. If you can.

++Lar



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Why the founding fathers limited government scope (was Re: Rolling Blackouts
 
(...) No, and that is not what I did. (...) I think I did. I _still_ think you are wrong. I do not feel that Israel "administers justice fairly" or respects the "rule of law". Eric Olsen agreed with me on this: (URL) chose to muddy the waters with (...) (23 years ago, 15-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Why the founding fathers limited government scope (was Re: Rolling Blackouts
 
(...) How wrong you are: "Israel has gotten, and continues to get, a raw deal in the world media, I have no idea why." (URL) A (...) (23 years ago, 14-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

246 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR