To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 10486
10485  |  10487
Subject: 
Re: Why the founding fathers limited government scope (was Re: Rolling Blackouts
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 14 May 2001 17:26:46 GMT
Viewed: 
2409 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Daniel Jassim writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> 
> > I am not going to reopen that particular thread except to say that I am
> > satisfied, based on my life long intake of news, opinion, propaganda and
> > falsehood, rather than based on any particular site, that my original
> > statement about which black was blacker is correct.
> 
> A "correct" opinion based on lies, falsehoods, generalization, and sheepish
> acceptance of the Zionist media model.

How wrong you are:

"Israel has gotten, and continues to get, a raw deal in the world media, I
have no idea why."

http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/debate/?n=6700

Scott A

> Not a learned, open minded or fact based
> opinion gleaned from comparative analysis. Thus, in a world ethics perspective,
> blatantly incorrect. An opinion more reflective of ignorance than intelligence.
> 
> > Further, I do think there are such a thing as terrorists.
> 
> And soldiers, heroes, murderers... All biased on who writes the history. One
> man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. Disagree? All depends on
> who's side you're on. You know who's side you're on, my friend.
> 
> Dan



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Why the founding fathers limited government scope (was Re: Rolling Blackouts
 
(...) Dan (25 years ago, 14-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
  Re: Why the founding fathers limited government scope (was Re: Rolling Blackouts
 
(...) So it's OK for you to quote out of context, then? (...) out of context, I would have chosen this one... (...) Since you never effectively answered it. (although you did post, what, 4 responses to it?... Why so many? Couldn't compose your (...) (25 years ago, 14-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Why the founding fathers limited government scope (was Re: Rolling Blackouts
 
(...) A "correct" opinion based on lies, falsehoods, generalization, and sheepish acceptance of the Zionist media model. Not a learned, open minded or fact based opinion gleaned from comparative analysis. Thus, in a world ethics perspective, (...) (25 years ago, 14-May-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

246 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR