 | | Re: Moon Landing Hoax
|
|
To All, Why is this in off.topic.fun? (...) This sounds like quite an opinionated statement, rather than a "fun" statement. I could say the sme thing about CNN, MS-NBC, etc. FUT off.topic.debate Scott S. ***...*** Please visit (URL) (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.fun, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Moon Landing Hoax
|
|
(...) This is why I love FOX. They arn't afraid of telling the truth and exposing government conspiracies. I hear that they are working right now on "The Earth really is flat" to be followed up by "We are the Center of the Universe". Nice, (...) (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Interview with LEGO at Toy Fair
|
|
(...) The real issue/problem is Lego's inconsistency in their position. Really, it's inconsistency to the point of absurdity. I don't have a problem with weapons in Lego, and I wouldn't have a problem if weapons were absent. It's just hard for me to (...) (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Moon Landing Hoax
|
|
(...) Nonsense! They must have gone to the moon--otherwise, where would they have gotten the alien for that autopsy? Dave! (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Moon Landing Hoax
|
|
(...) Sweeps. What happened to simply having Buzz Aldrin in a hot tub surrounded by bikini-clad models? ;-) Bruce (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Moon Landing Hoax
|
|
Thursday on Fox (9pm/8 Central) they are presenting a one hour program on why the moon landing was a hoax. They claim to have new evidence! See, proof! They wouldn't show it if it wasn't true! :~) Bill (24 years ago, 14-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Literal Creationism--a non sequitur!
|
|
(...) to himself or others. Perhaps an intervention is in order. However, at the bottom of the page Dr. D does make an interesting and absolute refutation of literal readings of the Bible when he indicates: GODISNOWHERE There are two obvious (...) (24 years ago, 12-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | My Underwear Buying Philosophy! (Re: was -- er whatever...)
|
|
You know, you guys really need to get out more. You're worried about my *touching* a rolled up undergarment as if I could infect it or something? Let's talk about ladies underwear for a second...most of the women's undergarments for sale in stores (...) (24 years ago, 11-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Just finished....
|
|
...Formatting my hard drive. Hence I am just now recovering and lost track of the messages that I was involved in with the Creation/Evolution debate. Anyhow I think I read most of them on the web interface and I don't really have much to say in (...) (24 years ago, 11-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: 6769 Fort Legoredo on sale at Shop At Home!!
|
|
(...) Sans quite that invective, I agree. Yeah, it sucks that they don't make the assortment you want, but it's selfish, crude, and technically illegal to go about opening packages. It's called product tampering at the very least, theft and fraud at (...) (24 years ago, 11-Feb-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
