 | | Re: New Web Page
|
|
On Wed, 12 May 1999 00:32:49 GMT, Larry Pieniazek uttered the following profundities... (...) No comments on education. I am not of schooling age, nor have children, or likely to in the near future. (When considering flameage in your replies, (...) (25 years ago, 12-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Terms and Conditions Question
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Simon Denscombe writes: "The whole natural point of having sex is reproduction or the possibility of it (contraception isn't 100% safe) - with homosexuals this is impossible." --> Copied from your post. Please stop (...) (25 years ago, 12-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: New Web Page
|
|
(...) Glad I don't live in the US then. Virtually all schools in the UK are public schools - it is 'different' to go to a private school. We have OFSTEAD inspectors and league tables based on exam results to keep standards up and give parents a good (...) (25 years ago, 12-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Terms and Conditions Question
|
|
(...) Nope that is not what I typed was it? Sex and walking are different things and there is no reason why they should behave in the same way. The whole point of walking is to get from A to B - whether A and B are the same place and the person has (...) (25 years ago, 12-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Terms and Conditions Question
|
|
(...) Don't have that problem in the UK no matter what Stonewall do. Calling someone gay is a regular namecall in some places. Lesbianism is more accepted however because two girls to a male is appealing... (...) Hmm. Ronnie O'Sullivan - snooker (...) (25 years ago, 12-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Terms and Conditions Question
|
|
(...) Read it again. (...) The bit 'or discrimination against homosexuality or homosexuals' was the main bit of focus and the meaning I use. The word 'or' in this case showing an alternaive meaning to 'Irrational fear of, aversion to' (25 years ago, 12-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Animal reproduction (was (of course?) Terms and Conditions Question)
|
|
<3739A6C9.4D71376@cc...souri.edu> <FBMy2u.Hy4@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) I missed the point (I guess) that this is the derivitave of 'natural' justification for homosexuality. That (...) (25 years ago, 12-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Animal reproduction (was (of course?) Terms and Conditions Question)
|
|
Christopher L. Weeks <c576653@cclabs.missouri.edu> wrote in message news:3739A6C9.4D7137...uri.edu... (...) the (...) Hardly. The original hypothesis floated here was that animals engage in homosexual behavior, thus humans have some sort of natural (...) (25 years ago, 12-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Animal reproduction (was (of course?) Terms and Conditions Question)
|
|
(...) This _may_ be, and I understand the style and its purpose, but since the conversation is about personal motivation for animals to engage in homosexual behavior, that frame of reference is inappropriate. (...) Are you asserting this, or are you (...) (25 years ago, 12-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: New Web Page
|
|
(...) Maybe you should be careful of what you hear? Would it be better if Larry had said "only one in ten thousand public schools would allow that level..." ? Nothing you said suggested that Weird Richard's operation would fly in your school (...) (25 years ago, 12-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
