To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 792
791  |  793
Subject: 
Re: Terms and Conditions Question
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 12 May 1999 20:52:50 GMT
Viewed: 
1790 times
  
"Christopher L. Weeks" wrote:
> I am a little uncomfortable with public displays of affection - I think
> it's crass, ill mannered, and impolite.  I once expressed the truthful
> opinion that I am a little more uncomfortable with homosexual (male)
> PDAs, and was verbally attacked and branded a homophobe by the
> (straight) people I was with.  I think these people were using Jesse's
> PC definition instead of your reasonable one and serves as an example
> application of the PC definition.

Don't have that problem in the UK no matter what Stonewall do.  Calling
someone gay is a regular namecall in some places.  Lesbianism is more
accepted however because two girls to a male is appealing...

> (Also, I think this tidbit of my psychology is interesting, as I
> consider myself decidedly non-homophopic, and even homofriendly.)

Hmm.
Ronnie O'Sullivan - snooker player - shall I go for the easy pink or the
tight brown?  :-)

--
Carbon 60
ICQ # 5643170



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Terms and Conditions Question
 
(...) Well, I think he disagrees with it too. Unless you mean that that's not the PC definition, and then I'd disagree with you. I am a little uncomfortable with public displays of affection - I think it's crass, ill mannered, and impolite. I once (...) (27 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

150 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR