Subject:
|
Re: Terms and Conditions Question
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 12 May 1999 20:52:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
705 times
|
| |
|
|
"Christopher L. Weeks" wrote:
> I am a little uncomfortable with public displays of affection - I think
> it's crass, ill mannered, and impolite. I once expressed the truthful
> opinion that I am a little more uncomfortable with homosexual (male)
> PDAs, and was verbally attacked and branded a homophobe by the
> (straight) people I was with. I think these people were using Jesse's
> PC definition instead of your reasonable one and serves as an example
> application of the PC definition.
Don't have that problem in the UK no matter what Stonewall do. Calling
someone gay is a regular namecall in some places. Lesbianism is more
accepted however because two girls to a male is appealing...
> (Also, I think this tidbit of my psychology is interesting, as I
> consider myself decidedly non-homophopic, and even homofriendly.)
Hmm.
Ronnie O'Sullivan - snooker player - shall I go for the easy pink or the
tight brown? :-)
--
Carbon 60
ICQ # 5643170
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Terms and Conditions Question
|
| (...) Well, I think he disagrees with it too. Unless you mean that that's not the PC definition, and then I'd disagree with you. I am a little uncomfortable with public displays of affection - I think it's crass, ill mannered, and impolite. I once (...) (25 years ago, 10-May-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
150 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
