 | | Re: One for the road sir? (Re: US supreme court strikes down...)
|
|
(...) Yes - (URL) are moves in the UK to form one. But even if it were to reach the agenda, and you imagine the haggling? And what would the benefit be, I'm already as free as a bird.. tweet tweet. I gruffly compared my freedoms to those you enjoy (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: IP ( was Re: LP POINT 1
|
|
(...) I have now corrected my spelling. (...) Yes. Naturally, just because it can be copyrighted does not make it right to do so. I think inventions and formulations can be copyrighted/patented to protect “investment” of time / money – otherwise (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | IP ( was Re: LP POINT 1
|
|
(...) Can you check that for a possible missing word? I read it a few times and haven't grokked it yet. Thanks! Maybe it's a UK turn of phrase? "voice decent at"?? (...) I'll give it a brief once over later today... you already know what I'm going (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: LP POINT 1
|
|
(...) If you rummage around, you’ll find that there are plenty within the LP who voice decent at every thing from your sign up clause (“I do not believe in or advocate the initiation of force as a means of achieving political or social goals.”), to (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: One for the road sir? (Re: US supreme court strikes down...)
|
|
(...) Oh my. Well, heavens. Quite a time! Um, and Scott, being a Briton, I do hope you realise that your country doesn't *have* a constitution. Well, I mean, they do have *stamina*, but no actual Constitution per se. So I suppose the point is moot (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Al Gore I am!
|
|
(...) Poll (another of those darn things) recently: 55% are anxious about the whole thing 21% are 'frightened and worried' (how that's different, who knows) 36% are 'amused' I think this means we need to lighten up. And before anyone makes the (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Libertarian debate in danger of pollution (was Re: Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less?
|
|
(...) It was whipped up on the spur of the moment. I'm glad it amused, and not too worried if it wasn't perfect. Nobody is perfect, you know, but some of us take comfort in being Forgiven, and some of us take comfort in improving ourselves. I know (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Do market based societies select for virtue? (was Re: Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less?
|
|
(...) Including me, of course, as I've said all along. I'll argue for 100% (of whatever) but gladly accept 75% (instead of the 32% I have now)... Based on some of the other stuff you've posted lately I may have to become a small l libertarian (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Do market based societies select for virtue? (was Re: Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less?
|
|
(...) This is all very Hayek - he proposed that the systems of behaviour in humanity is evolving – and that they survive because they are useful, in that they help “society”. He believed that The market had survived the test of time this based on (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Libertarian debate in danger of pollution (was Re: Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less?
|
|
(...) Todd bless you, brother..:-) We all believe in Todd, don't we?.. Selçuk (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
