|
|
 | | Re: LP POINT 3
|
| "Dave Schuler" <orrex@excite.com> wrote in message news:G4p452.23y@lugnet.com... (...) against (...) in (...) one (...) or (...) Fair points. But could, say, a school operate on a "no blacks" basis? (...) it. (...) Fair point. (...) work. (...) (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Cdn Election Day
|
| Well I've been out to vote, and I'll be scrutinizing tonight, including monitoring the count. And unlike our neighbours to the south, we'll know the results by tonight or tomorrow... 8-) SRC (Who's doing everything he can to help Betty Unger defeat (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Will Libertopia cause the needy to get less?
|
| One of the central arguments against libertarian principles is that there will be more poor starving folks. I assert that this will not be the case. It is to my benefit that my neighbor isn't starving and desperate. If he is, he is likely to rob me. (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | (canceled)
|
| | | | | | Re: From Harry Browne
|
| (...) I understand what you're saying, and as far as deterrent criteria, I agree with the ones you've cited (and which I've snipped). In the current system, an illegal drug carries with it the direct penalty of its use, in addition to whatever (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: LP POINT 3.3
|
| (...) As I mentioned above, there would be no central regulation. Yes you would be able to just buy a degree (you can do that today). Libertopia will offer more effective control because the "regulation" would be subject to the free market, which (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: LP POINT 3.2
|
| (...) Since this has been posted individually, I will point out that there was a thread (or at least a sub-thread) exploring this point. That debate (and it was a pretty good one) did not convince me one way or the other. Larry and other folks (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: LP POINT 3
|
| (...) No, my understanding of Libertarian philosophy is that you can say, "Irish aren't allowed." Or blacks, or Jews, or fat people, or whatever. People are free to boycott companies/individuals that do this, of course. I'll snip the rest 'cause I (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: LP POINT 3
|
| (...) Yes. I have never met a Libertarian who said otherwise. Most think it dumb, but they do believe you should be able to. (...) In the form of indentured servitude, yes. (...) I don't have the "official" Libertarian answer to this. This would be (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: LP POINT 3.2
|
| "Scott A" <eh105jb@mx1.pair.com> wrote in message news:G4p3vD.14C@lugnet.com... (...) So what is the point? Why are you now posting these individually? Why couldn't all of this be in one big post from the beginning?? ...I guess I'm learning who is a (...) (24 years ago, 27-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
