|
|
 | | NOTICE of REVOKATION
|
| One of my UK coworkers sent me this. (...) over (...) rules (...) to (...) is (...) armour (...) there (...) Russians (...) Day". (...) They forget their place, of course, since A) independence wasn't granted, we took it. So it can't be revoked. B) (...) (24 years ago, 16-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
| | | | | Re: From Harry Browne
|
| (...) Because at a certain point, abortion IS murder. By the end of the pregnancy the fetus is all but a baby, and deflating its/his/her skull is not letting it live. The rpoblem is, when exactly is that point; no one can say. The best solution is (...) (24 years ago, 16-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: From Harry Browne
|
| (...) Why should abortions be reduced? (...) Unwanted how? Rape? Carelessness? Would it matter? What would the options be? (...) For what reasons exactly would it be a hard decision? Do they revolve around you or the fetus? (...) *good* values:-) (...) (24 years ago, 16-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: From Harry Browne
|
| (...) IMO, yes. (...) Yes. (...) Well. Now that's a tougher one. My opinion on this is that the number of abortions should be decreased through means of *education* about contraceptives, about sex abstinance, and yes, values. I've been distilled (...) (24 years ago, 16-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Abortion, consistent with the LP stance? (Re: From Harry Browne
|
| (...) An optimistic notion, to be sure, but I don't know that it's consistent with reality. The process by which someone becomes hardened into a life of crime is insidious and *very* long term (or at least potentially so); I cannot imagine, nor has (...) (24 years ago, 16-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
