To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 7328
7327  |  7329
Subject: 
Re: From Harry Browne
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 16 Nov 2000 01:34:48 GMT
Viewed: 
929 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:


Maggie Cambron wrote:

I hope it's okay to butt in, but I have a question for you, Maggie (or anyone,
really; I guess that I just find women's perspectives more vested on this >topic).
Should a woman who engages in sexual activity as a willing participant be at >all
responsible for becoming pregnant?

IMO, yes.

Barring rape or contraceptive failure, hasn't
she brought the violation upon herself?

Yes.

I know that she doesn't *want* to become
pregnant, but if she is careless and becomes pregnant, then by what right >should
she be able to abort?  Is the pregnancy *really* against her will?  Her will >was
to play sexual roulette-- shouldn't she have to endure the consequences of her
actions?

Well. Now that's a tougher one.

My opinion on this is that the number of abortions should be decreased
through means of *education* about contraceptives, about sex abstinance, and
yes, values. I've been distilled with all of those, luckily, and I know that
I barring the above cases (rape, cc failure) I would not get pregnant
unwillingly. But there a lot of young women, even girls, out there who
haven't had that. Maybe they're missing on one, maybe more; but I think that
should be fixed.

I do NOT think that abortions should be outlawed, but reduced through these
means. I think that if, IF, I am ever faced with an unwanted pregnancy, I
would like to make my own decisions. It would be hard to make a decision
like that; and I would certainly not make it without levelheaded thought.
But others might.

<sigh> what a nice place the world would be if everyone had some values. <grin>

-Shiri



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: From Harry Browne
 
(...) Why should abortions be reduced? (...) Unwanted how? Rape? Carelessness? Would it matter? What would the options be? (...) For what reasons exactly would it be a hard decision? Do they revolve around you or the fetus? (...) *good* values:-) (...) (24 years ago, 16-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: From Harry Browne
 
Maggie Cambron wrote: I hope it's okay to butt in, but I have a question for you, Maggie (or anyone, really; I guess that I just find women's perspectives more vested on this topic). Should a woman who engages in sexual activity as a willing (...) (24 years ago, 15-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

279 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR