 | | Re: stuff (was: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
|
(...) What my parents did have nothing to do what I believed in, thank you very much. I chose for what I think is best. My mom never cared too much for politics, and I have not seen my dad in many years. (...) Well, since you know so much about me, (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
|
<387CF961.42F012A7@c...anweb.net> <FoAIpx.I2u@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) HI James, Governments, corporations, charities, people, etc. will all (in general) take and use as much power (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
|
(...) For what it's worth, I have a different take on this than Larry does. I agree that (to me, at least) Libertopia implies "our flavor of utopia" rather than something wholly different. And, I think the use of Liber-rama (which is how I'd spell (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Libertarian stuff
|
|
(...) But in Libertopia, everyone who chose to work would have more money due to wildly less government waste. If we all have more money it will be easier to donate more. So maybe there would then be 'enough' charity. right? (...) Does Libertopia (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Libertarian stuff
|
|
(...) Certainly I'm willing to consider it. I just don't think you'll be able to convince me. (...) When there are few of you, centralising yourselves and starting small certainly is easier than going for the big bucks right from the start. (...) (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
|
(...) You've heard of something called inflation, yes? You also realize that in a libertarian system, all that changes is _who_ pays, not _that_ it's paid? And that when the businesses you buy from pay, you still pay? Jasper (25 years ago, 17-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?]
|
|
(...) I certainly question it. Fortunately it's not what I've been saying. What I have an issue with is rather the artist who is not willing to suffer, but instead feels the world owes him funding as his due, for deigning to have decided to be an (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Are all papers with "Sun" in their name trashy?
|
|
(...) Now I'm usually quite good at innuendo, but that one has went right over my head and made a nasty mess on the wall. Richard (25 years ago, 17-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Are all papers with "Sun" in their name trashy?
|
|
(...) Inasmuch as "worthless" is a quality? Actually, most of the Sun papers in Canada and the UK are entertaining at the very least. (...) ...or your flock of German Shepherds? best, Lindsay (25 years ago, 17-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Are all papers with "Sun" in their name trashy?
|
|
(...) It's just not absorbant enough for me.. Richard (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Libertarian stuff (Was: Re: Art Debate Was: [Re: Swearing?])
|
|
(...) My point is that john is wrong, with corroborating evidence. (...) I spend a lot of time in areas the homeless are likely to hang out. It's called the inner city. Look at the statistics sometime - the US has a bigger problem, on average. (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Are all papers with "Sun" in their name trashy?
|
|
In article <MPG.12ebf024c0b516b...gnet.com>, richard.dee@virgin.net says... (...) The Sun is a quality paper, the sports coverage is the best - at least they are truthful, take News of the World who constantly get stuff wrong and the Daily Mail (1) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Government vs Corporations - Was: (Re: Art Debate)
|
|
James Brown wrote in message ... (...) The (...) put (...) valve (...) place? (...) impossible (...) event. From a civil suit point of view, it may be sufficient to sue the corporation. Ultimately, the board of directors is responsible. The (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: My Toys R Us Nightmare
|
|
Tom Stangl, VFAQman wrote in message <388113B3.23F0F572@vfaq.com>... (...) for one (...) to pay for (...) to prove (...) In North Carolina, personal possessions in the car are covered by homeowners/renters insurance, at least by State Farm. There (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Are all papers with "Sun" in their name trashy?
|
|
(...) All _Canadian_ Sun's are owned by the same people...and yes, they are trashy/semi tabloid. Canada's Papers National Post..Not bad, a Business Newspaper (the local papers by Thompson/Conrad Black are quite good usually) Toronto Star..used to be (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Are all papers with "Sun" in their name trashy?
|
|
On Fri, 12 Nov 1999 03:53:54 GMT, Larry Pieniazek uttered the following profundities... (...) The other example of trashy "Sun"'s is no doubt based on the UK version? You should check out the UK paper, "The Daily Sport," and its sibling, "The Sunday (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: An Alternative..
|
|
(...) Official what? (...) Ah - *thats* what you mean.. cool, agreed! (...) There's no reason why you couldn't use the existing infrastructure as a scaffolding to create a new one. (...) Except that the federal government can close or open any (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: An Alternative..
|
|
Richard Franks wrote in message ... (...) vote (...) Except, I suppose, officials? (...) great (...) It was a comparison. I wasn't sure if we were ready for square one yet. We need to be sure we are on about the same wavelength. (...) everything (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: An Alternative..
|
|
(...) I'll give it my best go. (...) I agree - because once you have Social Groupings that organise their own affairs independently, there won't be *MUCH* that you'd need *EVERYONE* to vote on at one time? (...) Well, if that means that you think my (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Government vs Corporations - Was: (Re: Art Debate)
|
|
(...) How do you hold a company's officers liable? If company X spills toxic goo into a river, who is responsible? The worker who didn't close the valve? The supervisor who didn't make sure it got closed? The process engineer who put the valve near (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jan-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
