 | | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
|
|
(...) Without providing any information of your own, your point is pointless. JOHN (18 years ago, 21-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
|
|
(...) No I don't have nearly enough information to make such an assertion, but YOU asserted that "The overwhelming majority of US troops in Iraq are positive, incouraged, and invested in their work." (...) My point is that YOU made an assertion (...) (18 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
|
|
(...) So, are you asserting that the majority aren't heroic, inspiring, and courageous? Point, please. Or is it that you simply like to hear the sound of your own fingers tapping the keyboard? JOHN (18 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
|
|
(...) Oh yeah? You went and asked them all? (...) Yeah, there will always be a few heroic, inspiring, and humbling soldiers. But don't make the misteak in thinking that their attitudes reflect the majority. ROSCO (18 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron inventories
|
|
(...) I thought that I was answering David's e-mail to my e-mail address. Sorry, I am not too sure how to do all these tree things here and there. It wasn't you, It was mad David. John P (18 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron inventories
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Patterson wrote: <Snip other peoples comments> (...) John, Does this mean that you are using instructions to build your inventories or are you using actual MISB set contents? The latter would be a lot more accurate, (...) (18 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
|
|
(...) That is a misleading story (go figure!) The overwhelming majority of US troops in Iraq are positive, incouraged, and invested in their work. Many there are re-ups. Yeah, there will always be a few malcontents. But don't make the misteak in (...) (18 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron inventories
|
|
--snip-- (...) Such a vast banquet of irony in so few words. (...) I have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. Would you care to show one of these 'emails with pictures' that you refer to? Since I don't remember ever sending you an email in (...) (18 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron inventories
|
|
(...) If anyone is spring loaded to the piss off position it is you. Regardless of what the page number was, the inventory is incorrect. Valium might be in the future for you, or high blood pressure. You really need to calm down. Let's remove all (...) (18 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
|
|
(...) Well, maybe. And then again (URL) maybe not.> Dave! (18 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron inventories
|
|
(...) And yet one of the corrections you made has already been shown to be wrong and maybe a second one too (I don't know and I don't care if it is or isn't). Most people might take that as a sign that possibly their checking wasn't quite as (...) (18 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron inventories
|
|
(...) Look at page 11 then, what I post here is quick, I sit for a very long time when I make the corrections and do not quote pages or steps. However you want to cut it, there are two tan bricks that are not in the inventory. That is the important (...) (18 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Peeron inventories
|
|
(...) Yes, it sure does. I rechecked it (page 7 that is), and I stand by my statement; no tan bricks. Perhaps your own inability to count has had a bad impact on the inventories you've made, and that's why they're not being accepted. David (18 years ago, 20-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest PDX 2007 - who's getting paid?
|
|
(...) That would seem like a fair compromise between risk and reward to me. Tim (18 years ago, 15-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest PDX 2007 - who's getting paid?
|
|
(...) Well, I'd rather see them all pay the fee beforehand, then be compensated (fee returned, nice lunch, whatever) after there's an indication how good the finances are (which is usually fairly apparent by the end of the public expo). ROSCO (18 years ago, 15-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
|
(...) Which bit? The liar bit, or the friend bit? You're coming along nicely, though. You'll be a fully-fledged CTOPper in no time. (18 years ago, 12-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
|
(...) It's just an expression, Al. (18 years ago, 12-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
|
(...) That's a bold assertion. Got any proof? (...) Is calling someone a liar, a troll and a jerk any way to treat a friend? (18 years ago, 12-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
|
(...) You, sir, are a liar. (...) If there is anyone on this board who would recognize mockery, my friend, it would be you. JOHN (18 years ago, 12-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: HMAS Fruit Bat
|
|
(...) It's just a turn of phrase, John. (...) Far be it from me to attempt to insult one as virtuous as yourself. (...) Are you mocking me? It certainly reads that way to me. (18 years ago, 12-Mar-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
