 | | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld
|
|
(...) No, I really felt pretty bad about it when I posted. I shouldn't be in .debate because I don't know what I'm talking about. I have to figure out a way to get mozilla to drop the extra slash from my lugnet history entry: (URL) way the .debate (...) (20 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld
|
|
(...) Don, I've never thought of you this way, so I assume you are being sarcastic? I myself am very passionate about the upcoming election simply because there is so much at stake. I've watched in horror over the past 3.5 years as our government (...) (20 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Arrogance floats amongst the stars...
|
|
(...) NB unexpected is not the same as uncommon! (...) ...it is in the UK! So mush so that Mugabe has "banned" the BBC. Scott A (20 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld
|
|
(...) I don't actually like him. In fact I cringe whenever I hear him speak. Probably the born again affectations that disturb me. Anyhow, I'm not as smart as you, so I can't really put into words why he's got my vote so far. Probably it's the war (...) (20 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Arrogance floats amongst the stars...
|
|
(...) I figured that it was okay because we have the same name. You can bring a few more Dons into the discussion, if you'd like... (...) That's fine, but the problem is that those reasons aren't sufficient justification to invade a sovereign (...) (20 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld
|
|
(...) Actually, you *can* win an election on that. But Ok, here goes... + Kerry, by all accounts, served his country with honor and bravery in Viet Nam, even though he could easily have dodged military service the way that Bush and Cheney did. On (...) (20 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Arrogance floats amongst the stars...
|
|
(...) Pedro, thanks for doing what others didn’t: recognise my point! I shall try to be less subtle next time :) Scott A (...) (20 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Arrogance floats amongst the stars...
|
|
(...) What is your point: Is he supposed to be grateful that he was not one of the inmates who ended up dead? Does a brutal and needless death(1) this week justify the brutality which pre-dated it? Scott A (1) …which was allegedly a reaction to (...) (20 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm Glad Bush is Standing by Rumsfeld
|
|
Ok, let me try again. I understand you don't like Bush, but I asked what you like about Kerry, or Nader, or anybody else. Is there nothing to like about them other than they're not GWB? You can't win an election on that. (20 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Arrogance floats amongst the stars...
|
|
(...) Sure, I thought that was the point of keeping a blog on the internet. (...) Ok, you're still being too subtle for me, because I still don't get it. Educated, not average, employed, so what. Enough with the subtle hints, you're just going to (...) (20 years ago, 13-May-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
