 | | Re: Heres a debate question for ya...
|
|
relative OTD newbie jumps in. Website: None yet, I gotta get me one of those Residence: Ontario, Southern California. Political: libertarian with a lower case L, because I don’t agree with all their views, but pro-capitalism, anti-big government, (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: "France is not a Western Country anymore"
|
|
(...) <snipped the adultery bit> (...) Determined by a judicial process... so once again, you need a judiciary... and because your theoretical system is dynamic, values for transgressions need to be determined each and every time, so it's going to (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: For some Lego is a religous experience. (Was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
|
|
(...) Indeed. (...) You see my problem is that science has yet to answer 'Why' anything happens. There are lots of good theories on how things happen but not one single answer as to why. It is my observation that people believe by analyzing things (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Heres a debate question for ya...
|
|
(...) Actually, 14. : ) And you say _I_ have inverted priorities? I mean, I'd so much rather uselessly run my mouth about something I'll make sense in rather than something political and making a fool of myself... Or have I done that already? (...) (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Heres a debate question for ya...
|
|
(...) "Little things"? "Sport debates"? Talk about inverted priorities...what are you, 12? -- Hop-Frog (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Heres a debate question for ya...
|
|
(...) How is this a safety valve may i ask? (...) True, but wouldn't debating thru emails work better? (...) True, but it be good to see something lego wise from them. (...) Yep, dats basically it. (...) Cool. (...) I care....because i care. (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | The U.S. Economy: The Thousand Yard Stare Through the Years
|
|
Wake up, Sunshine! You are not part of the wealthy elite and you probably never will be a member of any U.S. elite class. And yes, I posted this here because YOU do not "get it." And yes, when "they can't see their soul[s] in the mirror," they (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: The existance of god... MacHall style
|
|
(...) Hehe, funny. Terry (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Guess who's next?
|
|
(...) Maybe they thought that's where the chemical weapons were hidden? ;-) Terry (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | The existance of god... MacHall style
|
|
(URL) (Monday - April 21, 2003) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: off-topic.debate roll call
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> (...) Wow! you did the ++Lar right out of the gate! And I agree with your stance on the on-topicness of the question. Nice consistency over the years, Larry! Dave K (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Welcome Worn Out
|
|
(...) My parents always had respect for my wishes & rights. Scott A (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Guess who's next?
|
|
(...) ...while troops were busy toppling statutes for the benefit of the world's media. Scott A (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | off-topic.debate roll call
|
|
Sure, why not.. website: (URL) (commercial... buy something!) (URL) (slushpile of poorly organized stuff) Residence: Ada, Michigan, USA, but can be found practically anywhere in the US (don't seem to travel overseas as much post 911) at any given (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: WMD, again...
|
|
(...) I salute you, sir, for managing to (properly) end your Schuler-referential sentence with Dave! Well done! There's hope for you yet. ++Lar (Lar:communist :: John Neal:competent/willing 6 wide train builder) (I'm KIDDING!) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Heres a debate question for ya...
|
|
I'll bite also... (...) (URL) (...) 2 bedroom apartment in Beaverton Oregon, USA, a suburb of Portland. (...) Libertarian And because so much of our debate centers on religion: Unitarian Universalist (...) Masters of Engineering, Computer (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: WMD, again...
|
|
(...) :-) They'll have to wait until the POA comes up before the Supremes;-D Seriously, though, most of the people I know well are Christians, and so I don't have a lot of "deeper" conversations with non-religious people (not a chat room type of (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: WMD, again...
|
|
(...) Like the Schoolhouse Rocks girl at the end of exclamation... Aw darn! That's the end! Dave K (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Heres a debate question for ya...
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> (...) Agreed (...) Just for some sense of appeasement, and maybe know who's who here, (and this is totally not on-topic for off-topic ;) ) but would it be nice to have an o.t-d 'roll call' (...) (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: WMD, again...
|
|
(...) Sure--it was a good conversation. Maybe a little disappointing for an audience expecting to see us at one another's throats again, but that's how it goes. Dave! (21 years ago, 22-Apr-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
