 | | Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
|
|
(...) Because others do things in a way that doesn't adhere to the "Too high" standard that the almighty United States sets for the rest of the world... I'll stick with Canada, where new political party(s) can spring up overnight, and long standing (...) (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
|
|
(...) Alas, that's just the way it goes; do you think that in a government-less world that wouldn't be the case? I want the free market to cough up a free place for me to live, but the free market doesn't do that any more than the current situation (...) (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Outrageous Iraqi Geneva Convention Violation
|
|
(...) *YOU* are the one that *CONDEMNED* Iraq for breaking Geneva conventions. You want it every way as long as it's *your* way. You are adding *no* value except to perpetuate your own fallicious reasonings, ad nauseum. Go ahead, condemn the (...) (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Geneva Convention on POW treatment is just another inconvenience to the Iraqi Regime?
|
|
(...) Tables turned? You think our(U.S.)military would shoot at a downed pilot in the water unless that person was allready shooting at us?What's it going to take with you? (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Keeping tabs on a Useful Idiot
|
|
(...) So you (presumably being a friend, or at least sympathetic to some of his views) are then OK with out and out lying as long as it's in support of your cause? How morally relativistic of you, Dave! Where would you draw the line, exactly, at (...) (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
|
|
This one's for resident heavy-hitter and heavy-lifter Larry P, y'all know how he loves a cite from authority: "To announce that there must be no criticism of the President, or that we are to stand by the President, right or wrong, is not only (...) (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
|
|
(...) Does such an island exist? As far as I can tell, all land on this planet is either claimed by some particular government (and thus ought not to be hived off without the acquiescence of that government, or of the landowners or at least of (...) (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
|
|
(...) I think Larry is referring to the constraints of the monopoly of the 2 party system in America. As I have in the past, I see nothing wrong with joining one of the 2 parties and working for change *within* that context instead of trying to (...) (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Keeping tabs on a Useful Idiot
|
|
(...) Well I watched the Oscars in its entirety last night and I'd have to say that MM's little tirade was the harshest criticism of the war. But to say that he was 'loudly boo-ed' by the 3500+ celebs is a wee bit of a stretch. There were 'boo's (...) (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Keeping tabs on a Useful Idiot
|
|
(...) Ploughed ground, as they say. Even friends of Moore acknowledge his fast-and-loose treatment of facts and research. But at least his site links to some cool articles: www.michaelmoore.com WARNING: Not exactly a bastion of impartiality. Dave! (22 years ago, 24-Mar-03, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
