Subject:
|
Re: Just Teasing, I Have No Intention of Debating Any of This...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 24 Mar 2003 21:37:36 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1221 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> > > Preface: Plowed ground alert. I probably shouldn't have posted a flurry of
> > > responses, just summarised and let it go. This has been discussed before at
> > > length. That said, onward.
>
> > For clarification, by "free market" you mean a market operating without
> > the intervention of an overarching body, don't you?
>
> I think Larry is referring to the constraints of the monopoly of the 2 party
> system in America. As I have in the past, I see nothing wrong with joining one
> of the 2 parties and working for change *within* that context instead of trying
> to assert a completely independent third or fourth group.
>
> I like a 2 party system; I think a system such as Israel's is too chaotic and
> in the long run counterproductive and too prone to stalemate.
>
> JOHN
Because others do things in a way that doesn't adhere to the "Too high"
standard that the almighty United States sets for the rest of the world...
I'll stick with Canada, where new political party(s) can spring up
overnight, and long standing party(s) can just about disappear overnight ;)
5, or is it now 4.5 'official' political parties.
Boy I love being Canadian :)
Dave K
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
164 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
