|
|
 | | Re: Vote against/for...
|
| (...) Actually, Ken Krawchuk had a not-terrible showing in the PA gubernatorial race, pulling an estimated 6,652 votes versus (Green) Morrill's 4,952, and Krawchuk had at least *some* name recognition leading up to the election. The four main (...) (22 years ago, 6-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Vote against/for...
|
| (...) Ya "Most", Dave! Was gonna say "all" but hey, you know how it is, Dave! And if you've got a problem with that, you know where to go, Dave! :-) ++Lar (22 years ago, 6-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Vote against/for...
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes: <snip> (...) <snip> (...) How 'bout the US get off it's pretentious 'Mighter than thou so we can do as we please' high horse and smell the roses (or the toxic exhaust fumes from rampant consumerism) (...) (22 years ago, 6-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Vote against/for...
|
| (...) "Most?" Dave! (22 years ago, 6-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Vote against/for...
|
| (...) Since Libertarians didn't sweep to stunning victories in most of their races, I'm not sure I agree. Like I said elsewhere, I fear for the country. Having the House, Senate and White House all controlled by the same party (either one of the (...) (22 years ago, 6-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Vote against/for...
|
| (...) Sometimes we have no choice. (...) How about the world showing the US a little respect first. (...) Who would support this? (...) Who wouldn't vote for this? (...) I think America did that. -John (22 years ago, 6-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Conspiracy! (was Re: Shocked, just Shocked etc.)
|
| I am just hijacking the thread in service to my own nefarious purposes.... MUAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAH...AHAHAHA!!! Anyway, I was reading some Gore Vidal related stuff on the Observer UK site and realized that we must be missing some pretty wild stuff. (...) (22 years ago, 6-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Shocked, just Shocked to learn that .... The Beeb is not always right.
|
| (...) I don't understand why the chief executive officer has any business whatsoever in campaigning for members of the Legislative branch--isn't that a direct conflict of interest? I don't condemn Bush uniquely for this, although he's been a more (...) (22 years ago, 6-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Shocked, just Shocked to learn that .... The Beeb is not always right.
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes: <snip> (...) Shocked!! Shocked, I say, to find out that there's gambling in this here establishment!! This time, the gambling could escalate into very bad things for my neighbours to the south, as (...) (22 years ago, 6-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Party Funding
|
| (...) Democracy is a funny thing sometimes. Thankfully we have limits on what parties can spend. Scott A (22 years ago, 6-Nov-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
