 | | Re: What happened?
|
|
(...) No empirical evidence that's definitive, but theoretical proofs exist, (and not based on invisible heat sorting demons or market information communicators). Further, the less intervention there is, the longer the booms last and the less severe (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: What happened?
|
|
(...) So you are arguing that if you remove all Government intervention, then there won't be any business cycles? You are also apparently arguing that there has always been Government intervention? You appear to have argued yourself into a corner, (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: OS advocacy (was: Re: Perl rules!)
|
|
(...) Faster? In what way, running what apps? Sorry, but having used everything from the original lunchbox to the latest blue+white G3 on the Mac side and everything from the 8086 to a fully tripped-out P3-550, it ain't so. Maybe at various times (...) (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Extropianism
|
|
(...) As determined by what? Film studies majors? Happy endings sell better. (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: What happened?
|
|
(...) Your example is spurious. My kids were covered before they were born... under as private an insurance system as I could find at the time. And if they had had birth defects that prebirth testing could have discovered, we would not have had (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: What happened?
|
|
(...) Why were these jobs hard to come by? Perhaps it had something to do with the government meddling in the economy trying to make jobs easy to come by... It's always easy to try to explain away courses of action after the fact by citing excuses. (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: What happened?
|
|
(...) That's one of us, anyway. <zing> Just kidding. (...) Sorry, I forgot. There wasn't government back in 1503, and it didn't meddle in the economy either. How silly of me. (...) Trust me, government intervention wasn't done for god's sake, it was (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: OS advocacy (was: Re: Perl rules!)
|
|
(...) Unfortunately, there's raw speed and then there's effective speed. Today's Windows machine takes anywhere from 2 to 5 minutes to boot, in my experience. And from what I've seen, Macs aren't any better. Does anyone here remember the Apple ][ ? (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: An interesting URL from my favorite newspaper
|
|
(...) Sorry if you're having trouble recognising a joke even if the smiley is staring you in the face ans shouting: "HEY! This is a joke!". (...) That is your opinion. Stating it as fact does not make it so.[1] (...) Really? So the entire (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Government's role [Was: Re: What happened?]
|
|
(...) So call me a pessimist. (...) Ad hominem? Sorry, but "Libertopia (might equal) dystopia (as easily as) utopia" is hardly an ad hominem. It is directed at the word, not the man. Anyway, that aside.. I haven't yet seen you, or any other (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Government's role [Was: Re: What happened?]
|
|
(...) Where did I talk about anything but stereotypes? *muttermustreallybel...gegrumble* Jasper (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: OS advocacy (was: Re: Perl rules!)
|
|
(...) No. They are neither faster, nor cheaper, nor faster per unit of currency spent. It used to be, back in the glory days of PowerPC, that the fastest Mac boxes beat the fastest Intel boxes. Not any more. You do realise that the fastest Intel box (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Perl rules!
|
|
(...) Exactly. There is such a thing as local, but it only lasts the session. Therefore, a local cache should not persist beyond the session. You could possibly supplement that with a smaller (as server diskspace is a hell of a lot more expensive (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Perl rules!
|
|
(...) I've heard a sysadmin rant about how IE & NT Do Not Approve of that. He apparently was getting it set back to default automatically. Very weird, but then again, NT is weird. I'll take `vi sendmail.cf` over "Start, Configuration, Configuration (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Government's role [Was: Re: What happened?]
|
|
(...) Larry, As a father, how do you avoid the use of force? (pushing kids around) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | OS advocacy (was: Re: Perl rules!)
|
|
(...) Right, I think it's a bad argument tactic to suggest that Macs are cheaper than Intel hardware. It just ain't so. But, they are faster, more reliable, easier to use, easier to maintain, less reliant on MS (which matters to some), and home to (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Mac and NT networking (was: Re: Perl rules!)
|
|
(...) Whoever pointed out Zenworks was right. It's magic. And the Mac can too. I'm not our primary Mac person anymore so I don't know all the details but using MacIPX and Dave and maybe something else, they appear just as another workstation on the (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: Perl rules!
|
|
(...) You're not thinking of the same kind of environment. I have to provide hundreds of workstations for tens of thousands of casual users. There's no such thing as a "local" anything when those users move around and use random machines at random (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
| |
| | Re: The Americans are gonna destroy the Earth!!
|
|
(...) Too up-tight to get down, eh? Jasper (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Extropianism
|
|
(...) Of course, non-happy-endings usually end up being much better films.. Jasper (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
