To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / *16291 (-20)
  Re: Statistics of Deadly Quarrels
 
(...) Pretty much like .off-topic.debate, really 8?) ROSCO (22 years ago, 5-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: jumping to conclusions
 
(...) They have a rock to move and no lever. There are lands that they believe are by rights theirs that the state of Israel has occupied for a long time. They want an Israeli withdrawl. They've tried many things including appeal to the world (...) (22 years ago, 5-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  The role of child-welfare or protection in the main political ideologies?
 
Howdy, regular readers know that a personal topic of interest for me is child welfare and what that means. I take fairly radical stances on the issue (some think in opposite directions), but that's not really what this is supposed to be about. I'm (...) (22 years ago, 5-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Statistics of Deadly Quarrels
 
(...) You're funny Erik! I thought it was an interesting read even if it was weak on conclusion. Chris (22 years ago, 5-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Statistics of Deadly Quarrels
 
(...) "A fascinating contribution to our ignorance of the topic." "A tour-de-force of admitting to be unable to draw a conclusion." "Remarkably illustrates the refreshing emptiness of sociology." (22 years ago, 4-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Statistics of Deadly Quarrels
 
Interesting discussion of work by L.F.Richardson and others. (URL) (22 years ago, 4-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Peace in the Mid-East?
 
(...) Me neither, but I know they have halted some arms shipments in the past. (...) I'll end this with these words from Mosh Dayan: "Our American friends offer us money, arms, and advice. We take the money, we take the arms, and we decline the (...) (22 years ago, 1-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Cease fire (was: Re: Peace in the Mid-East?)
 
(...) That's odd, it’s my understanding that it is against the law to fund raise for the IRA in the USA... I may be wrong(?). By "repressive governments", do you include those who imprison suspects without trial? Interestingly, the UK will not hand (...) (22 years ago, 1-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Larry, come back to the light.
 
(...) How do you figure? (22 years ago, 1-May-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  And now, for a tottally different subject...
 
Hi all, Some while back, I remember having read on the newspaper about the LEGO concentration camp controversy, and some of the debate about it; well, today I saw a similar use of LEGO, at least in its intention. I was watching the news on TV, and (...) (22 years ago, 30-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Larry, come back to the light.
 
(...) Temporary insanity. -John (22 years ago, 30-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Cease fire (was: Re: Peace in the Mid-East?)
 
(...) Edinburgh. -John (22 years ago, 30-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Larry, come back to the light.
 
I agree with Larry P about wasted breath, but now he is a part of it. If you're listening Larry: Come back to the light. Jeremy P.S. Why do any of you care so much about this that you are cluttering a LEGO website with these messages? (22 years ago, 30-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Cease fire (was: Re: Peace in the Mid-East?)
 
(...) John, You said: "Anyone who supports the actions of terrorists is just as culpable as the terrorists themselves." I demonstrated that your tax dollars and your countrymen support "terror". I also shattered you allusion that Israel is a nation (...) (22 years ago, 30-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Cease fire (was: Re: Peace in the Mid-East?)
 
(...) hmm. That explains the rain today ;) Scott A Rain: (URL) (...) (22 years ago, 30-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Cease fire (was: Re: Peace in the Mid-East?)
 
(...) Life must be so deep and profound in your (intellectual) gray one. -John (22 years ago, 30-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Cease fire (was: Re: Peace in the Mid-East?)
 
(...) I'm sure Israel is gratful for your support. ;) (...) Life must be so simple in your (little) black & white world! Scott A (22 years ago, 30-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Cease fire (was: Re: Peace in the Mid-East?)
 
(...) Oh ya, I agree. But it's what you're up against here in this newsgroup. Until you can make this case (at the meta level), you're stuck. And no one here has been at all effective at making that case in the past. c.f. what happened to me when I (...) (22 years ago, 30-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Cease fire (was: Re: Peace in the Mid-East?)
 
(...) Isn't that merely deflection; skirting the issue at hand? I talk about Palestininan terrorism, and they shift the focus to *my* supposed support of terrorism. How is that germane? Merely as an attempt to discredit me as a hypocrite? (...) (22 years ago, 30-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Cease fire (was: Re: Peace in the Mid-East?)
 
(...) I happen to agree with this viewpoint.It's nice and tidy and has a nice absolute finality to it. No equivocating. But it has a big problem. It opens one up to questioning one's own motives. People who want to assail one's position will (...) (22 years ago, 30-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR