 | | Re: Had to Push it? (you immature twit)
|
|
(...) Indeed. And now the twit has removed them. I did, however, download the images and will be forwarding them to Kevin for his consideration. -John (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Had to Push it? (you immature twit)
|
|
"Rob Drechsel" <robo2705@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:GpJury.DpI@lugnet.com... (...) Jason at (...) don't (...) Though inappropriate, its 'Lego-related content.' I'd be expecting Tom Inosanto to be defending it anytime now. For the record, I (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Had to Push it? (you immature twit)
|
|
(...) This is uncalled for, and it's certainly not needed on brickshelf. I don't want to hear it justified because "it has bricks!" Rob robo2705@hotmail.com (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Had to Push it? (you immature twit)
|
|
Well, I think this sums it up: (URL) take long. And some moron will eventually come along and burn Jason at Brickfilms as well (to tie in another debate). <sigh> -John (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf
|
|
(...) I still don't see how they are abuse (now if a single individual had uploaded say 1000 [or even 10] avatars each in their own folder so that they dominated the recent updates pages, that might be abuse). To be honest, I find the pages (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf
|
|
(...) Of course many of the repeat viewings will be satisfied from cache and will take very little Brickshelf bandwidth (some is still used to check to see if the file has changed). I'm afraid we will have to let Kevin publish some stats on (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf
|
|
(...) I find that your statements to the effect that Jon is immature for suggesting it means you feel he is NOT within his rights. (...) You're not getting the point. We want a change in TOS. We realize they do belong, we want that to change. (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Inosanto writes: <snip> (...) Obviously, you don't. Have your own server host these erroneous bits of drivel if you do. (...) I don't think Jeff has to be told what he was saying, he's very competent. (...) This, (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf
|
|
<snip old convo> (...) Never said you could not ask for this ban. Please point me to where I did say that. (...) And I understand that. (...) lol, maybe not in that line but its what you are saying. (...) I agree with you 100% (...) Yes it does, go (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Bionicle Avatar pictures flooding BrickShelf
|
|
"tom" <tinosanto@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:GpJL5L.BLE@lugnet.com... (...) it, (...) And (...) Are you saying a majority opinion disliking the images would be irrelevant because they are LEGO related? Hypothetically, what if Kevin were to (...) (23 years ago, 7-Jan-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
