 | | Re: ...but Japan didn't agree with that assessment.
|
|
(...) must (...) And even if they do, it's just a case of the middle ground coinciding with the law. ROSCO (24 years ago, 2-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Girlfriends Guardians!!!
|
|
(...) Yes. (...) Yes. (...) But why should the rest of society have to live with the possibility that the offender's behavior may not be controlled? Or the possibility that the offender may decide not to show up for his Depo Provera treatment (or (...) (24 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Girlfriends Guardians!!!
|
|
The subject line made me think, at first, that we were talking about Paradisa mecha. ;) (...) Yes, but as long as she's under her guardians' (they're not her parents?) roof, they have the ability to monitor and modify her behaviour. Her other (...) (24 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Girlfriends Guardians!!!
|
|
This doesn't really apply to the root question anymore, but... (...) I've wondered about that as well. On one hand, if a medically demonstrable risk continues to exist that an individual will commit a crime again, is it not in the public's interest (...) (24 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Girlfriends Guardians!!!
|
|
(...) Just noticed this thread while trying to find info on clones, but anyway. I am an attorney in Washington State. It sounds like you would be safe from any criminal prosecutions if you had sexual relations (although she would not necessarily (...) (24 years ago, 1-Nov-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
