|
|
 | | Re: Gotta love Oracle...
|
| (...) Something that tends to get forgotten I think is that just because all _government_ regulation is removed that there will be no regulation. I'm sure many, if not most, of the licenses which exist today would exist in a Libertopia. The (...) (24 years ago, 9-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Gotta love Oracle...
|
| (...) First, it proves the driver knows how to drive; second, it issues HIM the responsability for his actions behind the wheel, and noone else. It acts more to third parties' safety/insurance than the driver himself. (...) Synonym, PLEASE! :-) And (...) (24 years ago, 8-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Violence created by presence of guns? (was: Gotta love Oracle...)
|
| In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Tom Stangl writes: (snipped) (...) Most criminals aren't psychic, either. So how can they tell if someone is armed or not? They just try their luck. If the victim is not armed, fine; if it is, too bad, one person will (...) (24 years ago, 8-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Gotta love Oracle...
|
| (...) Huh... does that mean only a few can decide my rights, if I belong to the mob? I disagree with you all the way. If more people want it, it is to be done. (...) (sorry, did not understand... please provide synonym. TIA) (...) Ah, yes. See (...) (24 years ago, 8-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | | | Re: Gotta love Oracle...
|
| (...) So if it is ultimately the driver's responsibility, what good then is the license or the act of issuing it? (...) There is no difference in kind among these. Both are abrogations of responsibility. I believe you are caught in a contradiction, (...) (24 years ago, 8-Oct-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
|
